Descriptor
| Federal Aid | 4 |
| Research and Development | 4 |
| Engineering | 2 |
| Financial Support | 2 |
| Research | 2 |
| Sciences | 2 |
| Scientific Research | 2 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Federal Government | 1 |
| Government Role | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Issues in Science and… | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Researchers | 2 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedShapiro, Harold T. – Issues in Science and Technology, 1986
Four individuals comment on a previous article (SE 539 642) which dealt with a national research strategy. These individuals are: (1) Harold T. Shapiro; (2) John Diebold; (3) Slade Gorton; and (4) Walter E. Massey. (JN)
Descriptors: Federal Aid, Financial Support, Research, Research and Development
Peer reviewedBloch, Erich – Issues in Science and Technology, 1986
Describes the growing pressures on the American system for conducting research, including new budgetary and political constraints, damage from cumulative neglect of the research infrastructure, and the changing nature/conduct of scientific research. To cope with these challenges, a national research strategy is recommended. Various aspects of the…
Descriptors: Engineering, Federal Aid, Financial Support, Policy
Peer reviewedBrooks, Harvey – Issues in Science and Technology, 1988
Notes the contributions that research universities are making to research and development in the United States, including their impact on science policy and economic growth. Urges that more funds be put into academic research institutions, arguing that current levels are proportionately low. (TW)
Descriptors: College Science, Engineering, Federal Aid, Higher Education
Peer reviewedKeyworth, George A., II – Issues in Science and Technology, 1988
Discusses the role of the science advisor to the President of the United States. Claims that, to have an effect, the advisor must address the President's issues rather than those of the science community. Argues that the view that the advisor is an ombudsman for scientists is a misconception. (TW)
Descriptors: Federal Aid, Federal Government, Government Role, Policy Formation


