Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Course Evaluation | 10 |
| Factor Analysis | 10 |
| Factor Structure | 10 |
| Higher Education | 6 |
| College Students | 5 |
| Student Attitudes | 5 |
| College Faculty | 4 |
| Foreign Countries | 4 |
| Questionnaires | 4 |
| Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 4 |
| Test Validity | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational and Psychological… | 2 |
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
| Interactive Learning… | 1 |
| Journal of Institutional… | 1 |
| Technology, Pedagogy and… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bhagat, Kaushal Kumar; Cheng, Chia-Hui; Koneru, Indira; Fook, Fong Soon; Chang, Chun-Yen – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
The aim of this study was to develop a scale to measure students' blended learning course experience. A total of 792 undergraduate students from Malaysia participated in this study. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed to evaluate the factor structure of the scale. As a result of EFA, three factors with 19 items that explained 68.06% of…
Descriptors: Blended Learning, Evaluation Methods, Course Evaluation, Student Attitudes
Patrick, Kate; Bedford, Anthony; Romagnano, Stephanie; Bedford, Michelle; Barber, James – Journal of Institutional Research, 2008
Like other universities, RMIT recognises the significance of graduates' ratings of their experience and has had a long-term commitment to improving student learning. As at other universities, RMIT's standard subject-level survey (the Course Experience Survey [CES]) incorporates items from the national Course Experience Questionnaire, with the aim…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Student Surveys, Intellectual Disciplines, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewedFinkbeiner, Carl T.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973
Study was conducted to determine the factor structure of the instrument being used at Cleveland State University, and to provide a means of revising the content of the instrument. (Authors)
Descriptors: College Students, Course Evaluation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Seng, Khoo Hock; Fraser, Barry J. – Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2008
Reviews of past research on psychosocial learning environments show that relatively few studies have involved the use of environment dimensions either as criterion variables in the evaluation computer education programs or with adult learners (in contrast to elementary and secondary school students). This study is distinctive in that it used a…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Program Evaluation, Adult Education, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedMoore, Michael – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
The validity of a Hebrew version of the Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire was investigated in eighty courses in science and engineering at the Israel Institute of Technology. Factor analysis revealed a reasonable correspondence between empirical structure and that afforded by logic and intuition. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedBarnoski, Robert P.; Sockloff, Alan L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Consistent with the distinction between student ratings (ratings assigned) and class ratals (ratings received), various properties of the FACE Instrument scales were investigated. (RC)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Course Evaluation, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedCranton, Patricia; Smith, Ronald A. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990
The underlying structure of student ratings of instruction was explored by using 3 units of analysis: (1) individual ratings from 42,407 college students; (2) class means; and (3) deviations from class means. Class means produce a different structure, calling into question the usual robust factor structure of ratings. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Course Evaluation, Factor Analysis
Davis, Richard W. – 1977
A method for statistical analysis of semantic differential data in educational evaluation is discussed. Estimated scores for unobserved affective variables are obtained using the canonical factor regression method. This method overcomes previous prolems of bias and inefficiency in computing composite affective indices. In an application of the…
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Affective Measures, Course Evaluation, Factor Analysis
PDF pending restorationBrandenburg, Dale C.; And Others – 1978
A pool of items used for student ratings of college instructors was studied by means of two factor analyses. Major objectives were to confirm the existence of the major dimensions of student ratings as identified in previous research literature, and to determine whether categories or levels of item specificity could be identified. As to the first…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Factor Analysis
Foster, Dennis R.; And Others – 1975
The purpose of the study was to develop a course-evaluation form for the assessment of student-centered courses. The development of the instrument was derived from theoretical views of student-courses which suggested five dimensions. The dimensions included bases of power, positive classroom environment, personal meaningfulness, student…
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, College Students, Course Evaluation, Factor Analysis

Direct link
