Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Creativity | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Creativity Research Journal | 1 |
Author
| Lu, Chia-Chen | 1 |
| Luh, Ding-Bang | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLu, Chia-Chen; Luh, Ding-Bang – Creativity Research Journal, 2012
Although previous studies have attempted to use different experiences of raters to rate product creativity by adopting the Consensus Assessment Method (CAT) approach, the validity of replacing CAT with another measurement tool has not been adequately tested. This study aimed to compare raters with different levels of experience (expert ves.…
Descriptors: Creativity, Interrater Reliability, Construct Validity, Comparative Analysis
