Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Content Validity | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Career Assessment | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 2 |
| Wide Range Achievement Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCreed, Peter A.; Conlon, Elizabeth G.; Dhaliwal, Kamal – Journal of Career Assessment, 2013
We used two studies to evaluate, modify, and provide initial validation for a revised Academic Hardiness scale. First, 16 experts rated scale items for content validity and identified two problematic questions. Second, confirmatory factor analyses with 300 Grade 10 students (46% boys, age range 14-17) identified a 17-item version to be the best…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Test Validity, Content Validity, Factor Analysis
Download full textZimowski, Michele F.; Wothke, Werner – 1987
Tests of spatial ability were analyzed for their analog (visuospatial) and nonanalog (verbal reasoning) components, using factor analyses of items and test scores. The self-selected sample consisted of over 2000 clients (average age about 26 or 27) employing the Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation's aptitude evaluation services in 12 metropolitan…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Content Validity, Factor Analysis
