NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Borowiec, Katrina; Castle, Courtney – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2019
Rater cognition or "think-aloud" studies have historically been used to enhance rater accuracy and consistency in writing and language assessments. As assessments are developed for new, complex constructs from the "Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)," the present study illustrates the utility of extending…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Scoring, Scoring Rubrics, Protocol Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dempster, Edith R.; Kirby, Nicola F. – Perspectives in Education, 2018
Taxonomies of cognitive demand are frequently used to ensure that assessment tasks include questions ranging from low to high cognitive demand. This paper investigates inter-rater agreement among four evaluators on the cognitive demand of the South African National Senior Certificate Life Sciences examinations after training, practice and…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Biological Sciences, Cognitive Processes, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wood, Timothy J. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2014
Medical education relies heavily on assessment formats that require raters to assess the competence and skills of learners. Unfortunately, there are often inconsistencies and variability in the scores raters assign. To ensure the scores from these assessment tools have validity, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive processes that…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Interrater Reliability, Cognitive Processes, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silverman, William H.; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1986
Examined how assessment center methods affect the way assessors organize and process assessment center information and affect the ratings they make. Results suggested that methods for evaluating assessment center candidates affected the way the assessors organized the assessment center information and affected the obtained ratings. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Cognitive Processes, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators