Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Course Content | 5 |
| Evaluation Problems | 5 |
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Course Evaluation | 2 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 2 |
| Interviews | 2 |
| Political Science | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Carey, George W. | 1 |
| Harland, Janice C. | 1 |
| Owston, Ronald D. | 1 |
| Thaxton, Lourene Pike | 1 |
| Weissberg, Robert | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Administrators | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thaxton, Lourene Pike – ProQuest LLC, 2009
Research indicated that students often graduate from colleges and universities without encountering critical thinking skills in undergraduate coursework. The first national report raising concerns over the declining quality of education stemmed from the National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983), and findings based on disappointing test…
Descriptors: Evidence, Undergraduate Study, Critical Thinking, Methods
Owston, Ronald D. – 1985
According to a recent survey, the quality of educational software is the single most stated concern of computer educators in Canada. Only a small fraction of the educational software is evaluated. The evaluation approaches that have emerged to deal with this problem are subjective and unreliable, and they do not provide an overall impression of a…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Course Content, Courseware, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedHarland, Janice C. – Biochemical Education, 1987
Discusses the problems of lecturers and students in a college course. Describes a staff-student liason committee. Gives examples of lecture evaluation instruments. Analyzes the effectiveness of the staff-student liaison groups and emphasizes the value of communication. (CW)
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, College Science, Course Content, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewedCarey, George W. – Perspectives on Political Science, 1993
Asserts that the presumption that student evaluation of teacher performance will eliminate poor or below-average teachers is dubious. Maintains that student evaluation is less harmful than peer evaluation. Argues that student evaluation is one of several factors that contribute to the decline of U.S. universities. (CFR)
Descriptors: Course Content, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedWeissberg, Robert – Perspectives on Political Science, 1993
Maintains that the standardized teacher/course evaluation form has become a ritual at virtually every major U.S. university. Argues that many good teachers are unrewarded, ineffective ones win prizes, and the evaluation process is a means of monitoring political orthodoxy. (CFR)
Descriptors: Course Content, Course Evaluation, Educational History, Educational Philosophy

Direct link
