Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 33 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 181 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 464 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1465 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 8674 |
| Program Evaluation | 8674 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1739 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1429 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1371 |
| Models | 1196 |
| Higher Education | 1156 |
| Foreign Countries | 928 |
| Educational Assessment | 883 |
| Program Development | 793 |
| Research Methodology | 737 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 690 |
| Administrators | 325 |
| Researchers | 256 |
| Teachers | 174 |
| Policymakers | 147 |
| Community | 21 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Media Staff | 15 |
| Students | 13 |
| Counselors | 7 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 203 |
| California | 119 |
| Australia | 110 |
| Illinois | 99 |
| United Kingdom | 99 |
| Florida | 87 |
| United States | 74 |
| Texas | 62 |
| New York | 58 |
| Pennsylvania | 57 |
| North Carolina | 53 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedCole, Galen E. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
Provides strategies for constructing theories of theory-based evaluation and provides examples in the field of public health. Techniques are designed to systematize and bring objectivity to the process of theory construction. Also introduces a framework of program theory. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Public Health, Theories
Peer reviewedReckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1998
Considers what a responsible test developer would do to gain information to support the consequential basis of validity for a test early in the development. How the consequential basis of validity of the program would be monitored and reported during the life of the program is examined. The validity of the ACT Assessment is considered as if it…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Test Construction, Validity
Peer reviewedLove, A. J.; Russon, C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000
Describes efforts to build a worldwide evaluation community, noting events that resulted in an almost 200% growth in the number of regional and national evaluation organizations in slightly more than 1 year. Profiles some national and regional evaluation organizations that participated in a recent evaluation meeting and suggests some alternative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, International Organizations, Program Evaluation
Phillips, Jack J. – Training and Development, 1996
Provides a basic formula for calculating the return-on-investment of training: (1) collect evaluation data; (2) isolate effects of training from other factors; (3) convert results to monetary benefits; (4) total costs of training; and (5) compare the benefits with the cost. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Training
Peer reviewedDavidson, E. Jane – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Explores the relative strengths and weaknesses of program theory as a tool for inferring causality and outlines a five-stage approach that makes increased use of inductively built program theories as it takes more deliberate account of the varying levels of certainty that are required for evaluative conclusions. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Causal Models, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Theories
Peer reviewedPetrosino, Anthony – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Even simple program theory evaluations could be used in meta-analysis to provide benefits. Explores several ways to combine program theory evaluation and meta-analysis, using a hypothetical model and an actual example from a federal funding program. Outlines four potential benefits to incorporating program theory evaluation into meta-analysis.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Meta Analysis, Program Evaluation, Theories
Peer reviewedObrecht, Michael – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation/La Revue canadienne d'evaluation de programme, 1999
Describe the role of an expert panel in setting priorities for evaluative work. An expert panel with high credibility inside and outside the organization that is at arms length to both the organization and external stakeholders can bypass many communications filters and provide a distilled and clear reading of stakeholder concerns. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Needs Assessment, Program Evaluation, Stakeholders
Peer reviewedSidani, Souraya; Sechrest, Lee – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
Presents a conceptual framework for putting program theory into operation. The framework incorporates variables that reflect theoretical concepts and implementation issues addressed in program evaluation. It organizes variables into input, process, and output categories. Discusses implications for program evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMillar, Annie; Simeone, Ronald S.; Carnevale, John T. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2001
Provides managers with specific guidance on developing and using logic models. For the last 20 years logic models have been used largely in program evaluations to chart what should have happened and what did or did not occur as intended. Logic models start with inputs and work through processes to the desired end state, whether output or outcome.…
Descriptors: Administrators, Evaluation Methods, Logic, Models
Peer reviewedNevo, David – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2001
Makes the case that both internal and external evaluation are needed in the assessment of educational systems. Suggests some conditions have to be met to establish a constructive dialogue between internal and external evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedChelimsky, Eleanor – American Journal of Evaluation, 2001
Discusses the challenges facing foundations and offers a nine-part framework to suggest how an evaluation office can help foundations meet these challenges. The emphasis on capacity building is also of interest to organizations other than foundations. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Philanthropic Foundations, Program Evaluation
Jinnah, Hamida Amirali; Walters, Lynda Henley – Early Childhood Research & Practice, 2008
Program evaluation practices in early childhood care and education have been underdeveloped compared to the larger field of educational evaluation. The inclination not to include parental views in evaluation is mainly a result of the problem of positive response bias. Researchers who study client satisfaction with educational or child care…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Parent Attitudes, Parent Participation, Multivariate Analysis
Arango, Lisa Lewis; Kurtines, William M.; Montgomery, Marilyn J.; Ritchie, Rachel – Journal of Adolescent Research, 2008
The study reported in this article, a Multi-Stage Longitudinal Comparative Design Stage II evaluation conducted as a planned preliminary efficacy evaluation (psychometric evaluation of measures, short-term controlled outcome studies, etc.) of the Changing Lives Program (CLP), provided evidence for the reliability and validity of the qualitative…
Descriptors: Quasiexperimental Design, Intervention, Research Methodology, Validity
Andrews, Kristen E.; Tressler, Kurt D.; Mintzes, Joel J. – Environmental Education Research, 2008
Despite its importance as a central goal in environmental education, there appears to be little consensus about how best to document, assess and evaluate understanding of environmental concepts. This illustrative case study describes and demonstrates the use of the concept mapping strategy as an effective tool for assessing environmental…
Descriptors: Concept Mapping, Animals, Marine Education, Environmental Education
Guillen-Woods, Blanca Flor; Kaiser, Monica A.; Harrington, Maura J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is usually understood in relation to schools and districts, but the legislation has also affected community-based organizations that operate school-linked programs. This case study of an after-school program in California demonstrates how educational accountability systems that emphasize students' academic…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, After School Programs

Direct link
