NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 106 to 120 of 213 results Save | Export
Hambleton, Ronald K. – 1983
This paper offers answers to nine important questions concerning standard-setting issues and methods: (1) Should normative or content-referenced standards be used? (2) Different standard-setting methods yield different results. What is your reaction to this finding? That of your clients? Does this finding present a problem for the application of…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Meskauskas, John A. – 1983
This paper presents the author's responses to nine questions addressed to the standard-setting symposium participants. A central theme in this assessment is that one cannot clearly demonstrate, a priori, that either a normative or a content-referenced approach is superior. Most methods used to date have been insufficiently grounded in…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Research Methodology, Research Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Engelhard, George, Jr.; Stone, Gregory E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998
A new approach based on Rasch measurement theory is described for examining the quality of ratings from standard-setting judges. Ratings of nine judges for 213 items on a nursing examination show that judges vary in their views of the essential items for nursing certification, with statistically significant variability in the judged essentiality…
Descriptors: Certification, Evaluation Methods, Item Response Theory, Judges
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2006
A conceptual framework is proposed for a psychometric theory of standard setting. The framework suggests that participants in a standard setting process (panelists) develop an internal, intended standard as a result of training and the participant's background. The goal of a standard setting process is to convert panelists' intended standards to…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Standard Setting, Evaluation Criteria, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Taylor, Paul; Braddock, Richard – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2007
We look at some of the theoretical and methodological issues underlying international university ranking systems and, in particular, their conceptual connection with the idea of excellence. We then turn to a critical examination of the two best-known international university ranking systems--the "Times Higher Education Supplement (THES)" World…
Descriptors: Institutional Evaluation, Classification, Comparative Education, Comparative Analysis
Reckase, Mark D. – 1998
Standard setting is a fairly widespread activity in educational and psychological measurement, but there is no formal psychometric theory to guide the development of standard setting methodology. This paper presents a conceptual framework for such a psychometric theory and uses the conceptual framework to analyze a number of methods for setting…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Judges, Measurement Techniques
Sigmon, Gary L.; Halpin, Gerald – 1984
Traditionally, judgmental standard setting methods have been used exclusively at the test item level. In this study, the Ebel and Angoff methods of standard setting were utilized to determine minimum competency standards on a list of 175 identified competency statements for vocational evaluators. The following research questions were addressed:…
Descriptors: Certification, College Faculty, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods
Yang, Wen-Ling – 2000
The Achievement-Levels Setting (ALS) process for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) resulted in numerical cutscores on the NAEP score scale representing the performance standards for three achievement levels: Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. This paper focuses on an important, but less researched, aspect of the standard setting…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Civics, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berk, Ronald A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
A brief summary of standard setting knowledge is presented, derived from about 20 methods that utilize a judgmental review process, the approach most relevant to the standard-setting strategies proposed in this special issue. Criteria for judging effectiveness and critiques of the methods discussed in the issue are offered. (SLD)
Descriptors: Criteria, Decision Making, Educational History, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunter, Darryl M.; Gambell, Trevor J. – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2000
Discusses the roles played by participants and the processes involved in a provincial standards-setting exercise for a large-scale assessment of student skills. Offers perspectives of a policy maker outside the exercise and an insider participant. Describes alternate notions of representativeness, stakes, and significance. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Policy Formation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lin, Jie – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 2006
The Bookmark standard-setting procedure was developed to address the perceived problems with the most popular method for setting cut-scores: the Angoff procedure (Angoff, 1971). The purposes of this article are to review the Bookmark procedure and evaluate it in terms of Berk's (1986) criteria for evaluating cut-score setting methods. The…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Research
Pell, Godfrey; Roberts, T. E. – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2006
The increase in litigation by students who are dissatisfied with their assessment, and to a lesser extent the time and monetary costs of student appeals makes it imperative that institutions adopt a robust assessment strategy. The concern of consumers with respect to professional services offered by students after graduation is also an issue. This…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Standard Setting, Medical Education, Evaluation Methods
Kennedy, Brianna – Metropolitan Universities, 2007
The burgeoning field of Out-of-School Time provides academic and social services to K-12 students during the time that they are not in school. Hundreds of service providers offer a range of programs that target various student populations. Many tools exist to measure program performance, but no uniform evaluation methods exist to inform funders…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, After School Programs, Program Effectiveness, Articulation (Education)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pokholkov, Yuri P.; Chuchalin, Alexander I.; Agranovich, Boris L.; Mogilnitsky, Sergey B. – Higher Education in Europe, 2007
This article considers some patterns of ranking higher education institutions which are used in the Russian Federation to reveal strengths and weaknesses in meeting the national individual, societal and state-related needs, as well as those of the international academic community concerning relevant information on Russian higher education…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Comparative Analysis, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barnes, Barbara E.; Cole, Jeanne G.; King, Catherine Thomas; Zukowski, Rebecca; Allgier-Baker, Tracy; Rubio, Doris McGartland; Thorndyke, Luanne E. – Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2007
Introduction: Heightened concerns about industry influence on continuing medical education (CME) have prompted tighter controls on the management of commercial funding and conflict of interest. As a result, CME providers must closely monitor their activities and intervene if bias or noncompliance with accreditation standards is likely. Potential…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Conflict of Interest, Program Validation, Professional Continuing Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  ...  |  15