Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 6 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 28 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 53 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 317 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Stufflebeam, Daniel L. | 6 |
| Scriven, Michael | 5 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 4 |
| House, Ernest R. | 4 |
| Morris, Michael | 4 |
| Bagnato, Stephen J. | 3 |
| Bielinski, John | 3 |
| Collis, Betty | 3 |
| Greene, Jennifer C. | 3 |
| Hendricks, Bruce | 3 |
| Thurlow, Martha | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 60 |
| Researchers | 40 |
| Teachers | 31 |
| Administrators | 20 |
| Policymakers | 16 |
| Community | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 19 |
| Australia | 18 |
| Canada | 15 |
| United States | 13 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 11 |
| Florida | 9 |
| Germany | 8 |
| Texas | 6 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 6 |
| California | 5 |
| Netherlands | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHarland, Janice C. – Biochemical Education, 1987
Discusses the problems of lecturers and students in a college course. Describes a staff-student liason committee. Gives examples of lecture evaluation instruments. Analyzes the effectiveness of the staff-student liaison groups and emphasizes the value of communication. (CW)
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, College Science, Course Content, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewedFarr, Roger; And Others – Elementary School Journal, 1987
Describes reading-textbook evaluation and selection processes and argues that improved basal readers are likely to be developed if textbook adoption procedures improve. States that basal reader evaluation criteria and procedures should be developed and applied by those professionals most directly responsible for the teaching of reading. (Author/NH)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Committees, Elementary Education, Elementary School Teachers
Southwest Educational Development Lab., Austin, TX. – 2001
One of a series of booklets on disability research, this paper is intended as an introduction to the role of evaluation in the utilization process. Its purpose is to help disability researchers grasp the importance of incorporating a focus on assessing use into plans for disseminating research outcomes. The paper begins by examining basic…
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Disabilities, Evaluation
Bond, Lloyd – Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2005
The writer calls attention to the many traps associated with one of the most frequent uses of assessment: the technical difficulties of measuring changes in learning over time. Noting that psychometricians don't like "change" or "difference" scores in statistical analyses because they tend to have lower reliability than the original measures…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Teacher Education Curriculum, Educational Assessment, Reliability
Garcia, Paul A. – 2000
This paper outlines important considerations for program evaluators and school administrators when creating evaluation designs, disaggregating student outcome data, and interpreting and reporting achievement data for improved program implementation and informed classroom instruction to ensure treatment of English Learner (EL) students. Evaluation…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Limited English Speaking
Peer reviewedSteele, Marcee M.; Steele, John W. – TechTrends, 1996
This article discusses problems in the psychological processing theory for learning disabilities assessment and describes the development and potential use of an interactive diagnostic system for testing students' processing skills for learning disabilities. (AEF)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewedHouse, Ernest R. – Educational Researcher, 1990
Discusses the following aspects of educational evaluation: (1) structural changes; (2) conceptual changes; (3) mixed methods and unraveling consensus; (4) utilization of findings; (5) the role of values; and (6) the role of politics. Discusses how evaluation moved from monolithic to pluralistic, reflecting the change from consensus to pluralism in…
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Cultural Pluralism, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewedSirotnik, Kenneth A., Ed. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1990
This issue includes four papers conceptualizing and analyzing the issues of evaluation and social justice. An evaluative model is presented as a way of improving educational practice at the school level. Implications of evaluation are examined relative to a moral and ethical stance rooted in conceptions of social justice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education, Ethics
Peer reviewedStrickland, Dorothy S.; Morrow, Lesley Mandel – Reading Teacher, 1989
Examines the problems of using standardized tests to measure the development of early literacy. Notes that assessment is used to design instruction, and should reflect the skills and knowledge that are developing in young children. Provides examples of informal assessment contexts, such as interactive dialogues, observation, and performance…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Beginning Writing, Emergent Literacy, Evaluation Methods
Morrison, Keith – Compare, 1994
Argues for a diverse response to the issues and objectives concerning assessment. Highlights a wide variety of assessment procedures from foreign schools, each one relevant to the local culture and educational objectives. Discusses the inherent dangers in overemphasizing, as well as underemphasizing, assessment. (MJP)
Descriptors: Behaviorism, Comparative Education, Credentials, Educational Policy
Peer reviewedMelton, Reginald F. – Open Learning, 1995
Describes steps taken in developing an evaluation system for distance teaching at the Open Junior High School system in Indonesia. Reviews data collection techniques, and discusses advantages and disadvantages of evaluation studies. Presents a historical background of the system, and lists the system's strengths and weaknesses discovered via…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Distance Education, Educational Development, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedClark, Richard E. – Academic Medicine, 1992
Most evaluations of technology-based instruction are poorly designed because of failure to control three common confounding variables: (1) use of different instructional methods in different treatments; (2) presentation of different content in different treatments; and (3) the novelty of new media, which tends to increase early motivation and…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Educational Economics, Educational Media, Educational Technology
Peer reviewedDeStefano, Lizanne – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1992
Citing the signaling and charged use distinction, examines federal expectations and need for evaluation data and extent of local capabilities to meet those expectations when secondary/transition model demonstration projects, funded by the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, were obligated to improve amount, quality, and use of…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLeCroy, Hoyt – Music Educators Journal, 1999
Maintains that a professionally conducted assessment, both quantitative and qualitative, is the beginning of successful strategic planning. Discusses assessment standards and identifies future assessment models for music education. Considers the use of quantitative and qualitative assessments and addresses what should occur during a three-year…
Descriptors: Educational Planning, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewedCandoli, Carl; And Others – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1995
This article identifies 12 commonly used models for evaluating superintendents and analyzes them through questions related to the "Personnel Evaluation Standards" of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Models are grouped into those based on global judgment, judgment based on specific criteria, or data-driven…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Alternative Assessment, Criteria, Decision Making


