Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 14 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 34 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 77 |
| Scoring Formulas | 77 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 24 |
| Grading | 17 |
| Scoring | 16 |
| Higher Education | 15 |
| Student Evaluation | 12 |
| Test Reliability | 12 |
| Educational Practices | 11 |
| Achievement Gains | 10 |
| Foreign Countries | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Lord, Frederic M. | 2 |
| Williamson, David M. | 2 |
| Aghbar, Ali-Asghar | 1 |
| Allison, Howard K., II | 1 |
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Bardhoshi, Gerta | 1 |
| Barkaoui, Khaled | 1 |
| Bejar, Isaac I. | 1 |
| Ben-Simon, Anat | 1 |
| Bengston, John K. | 1 |
| Bennett, John | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 15 |
| Postsecondary Education | 10 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
| Elementary Education | 4 |
| Adult Education | 3 |
| Grade 7 | 3 |
| Secondary Education | 3 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Community | 5 |
| Parents | 5 |
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Florida | 6 |
| China | 2 |
| New York | 2 |
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Denmark | 1 |
| Malaysia | 1 |
| Turkey | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tollefson, Nona; Chung, Jing-Mei – 1986
Procedures for correcting for guessing and for assessing partial knowledge (correction-for-guessing, three-decision scoring, elimination/inclusion scoring, and confidence or probabilistic scoring) are discussed. Mean scores and internal consistency reliability estimates were compared across three administration and scoring procedures for…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedMcCormick, James H.; And Others – Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1982
This study identifies critical elements of the front dive half-twist that judges are likely to look for when they score springboard diving competitions. Videotapes of divers at a 1979 intercollegiate diving meet were made and analyzed, using grid scoring procedures, to isolate components of the dives that would help predict judges' scores.…
Descriptors: Athletics, College Students, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedBuchy, Marlene; Quinlan, Kathleen M. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2000
Adapted the scoring matrix, a method used to facilitate community participation in planning and monitoring development projects, to a university course in participatory resource management. Suggests the matrix is an example of how discipline-specific tools can be adapted to serve the dual purposes of promoting experiential learning of…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Community Development, Environmental Education, Evaluation Methods
Purves, Alan C.; And Others – 1990
After establishing a theoretical depiction of the domain of literature learning, a study developed test packages which examined: (1) the relationship among multiple choice, short open-ended, and long open-ended responses; (2) whether there would be differences according to the genres; (3) the relationship between literary and non-literary texts,…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, High Schools, Literary Genres
Peer reviewedKoenke, Karl – Journal of Reading, 1971
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Peer reviewedZughoul, Muhammad R.; Kambal, M. Osman – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1983
Based on the responses of 50 ESL instructors to a composition-scoring exercise, a detailed method of scoring compositions was developed that divides the writing into basic components (structure, content, vocabulary, organization, and mechanics) and provides a scoring mechanism for each component for each of three competency levels. (MSE)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Ben-Simon, Anat; Bennett, Randy Elliott – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
This study evaluated a "substantively driven" method for scoring NAEP writing assessments automatically. The study used variations of an existing commercial program, e-rater[R], to compare the performance of three approaches to automated essay scoring: a "brute-empirical" approach in which variables are selected and weighted solely according to…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Scoring, Essays
Cole, Nancy S. – 1982
The advantages and disadvantages of grade equivalent (GE) scores are explored, including appropriate uses for GE type scores and how to bring current GE scales closer to the type of information educators appear to desire. Although GE scores are not an equal interval scale, not comparable across school subjects, and do not indicate the grade level…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Smith, Richard M. – 1982
There have been many attempts to formulate a procedure for extracting information from incorrect responses to multiple choice items, i.e., the assessment of partial knowledge. The results of these attempts can be described as inconsistent at best. It is hypothesized that these inconsistencies arise from three methodological problems: the…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Goodness of Fit, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewedLane, Irving M.; And Others – Group and Organization Studies, 1981
Presents both logical and empirical evidence to illustrate that the conventional scoring algorithm for ranking tasks significantly underestimates the initial level of group ability and that Slevin's alternative scoring algorithm significantly overestimates the initial level of ability. Presents a modification of Slevin's algorithm which authors…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Algorithms, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics
Morgan, Deanna L.; Michaelides, Michalis P. – College Board, 2005
Due to the high stakes that my be attached to placement decisions, it is imperative that the placement process be as solid and defensible as possible. An integral part of the placement process is the identification and use of cut scores, the point(s) on the score scale that classify students into adjacent categories for placement decisions. This…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Student Placement, Academic Standards, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedLord, Frederic M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Oriented Programs, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedParlee, N. A. D. – Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 1979
The Outside World Experience (OWE) Index--a weighted index of industrial, government, business, consulting, or other experience outside academia--is discussed as an important assessment measure for department faculty. Formulas for calculating the OWE Index as applied to schools, departments, and individual faculty members are included. (SF)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Department Heads, Departments, Evaluation Methods
Illinois State Board of Education, Springfield. Evaluation and Assessment Section. – 1984
This report identifies the methods and issues in the evaluation of student writing in classrooms and large scale assessments using an analytical scoring system from the Illinois Inventory of Educational Progress (IIEP). This guide is written for staff in state offices of education conducting large-scale writing assessments, and also for personnel…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Methods, Elementary Secondary Education, Essay Tests
Lutkus, Anthony D. – 1978
The use of a computerized system is described in which students rate each other's term papers via the computer program PEERRATE, which creates a matrix of intervals between ratings received and calculates final ratings incorporating a mean and standard deviation selected by the instructor for the class. As described, the program includes: (1)…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Oriented Programs, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Direct link
