Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 12 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 27 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 155 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 86 |
| Administrators | 40 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Researchers | 24 |
| Policymakers | 17 |
| Counselors | 12 |
| Students | 11 |
| Community | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| Illinois | 21 |
| California | 20 |
| Canada | 19 |
| Australia | 10 |
| United Kingdom | 10 |
| Florida | 9 |
| Pennsylvania | 9 |
| Texas | 8 |
| Maryland | 7 |
| Michigan | 7 |
| New York | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 2 |
| California Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
| General Educational… | 1 |
| Levels of Use of the… | 1 |
| Stanford Diagnostic Reading… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rapp, Marjorie L. – 1972
This paper presents a model for continuous, systematic evaluation of ongoing programs and specifies data needed for decisionmaking in the areas of program adoption, curtailment, or expansion. These data give the decisionmaker the necessary information for program planning in today's sophisticated educational environment. (Author/RA)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Decision Making, Educational Environment, Educational Programs
Peer reviewedBonfadini, John – Technology Teacher, 1985
A study was conducted to develop a diagnostic instrument for students to evaluate student teachers. The result was an instrument containing 40 evaluation items divided into four major categories: personal traits, professional competence, student-teacher relationship, and classroom management. Results of instrument use are discussed. (CT)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Personality Traits, Program Evaluation
McCracken, J. David; And Others – Agricultural Education Magazine, 1985
Articles discuss evaluation of vocational agriculture: considerations for improving local program evaluation, self-rating a program, step-by-step program evaluation, advisory council assistance with evaluation, using an advisory committee in evaluation, accreditation evaluation, evaluation programs for handicapped students, evaluating agricultural…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Advisory Committees, Agricultural Education, Agricultural Engineering
Mathis, William – CEDR Quarterly, 1980
A number of ways in which evaluations may be biased are illustrated: (1) policy and political purposes for evaluations; (2) sources of policy or political bias prior to evaluation activities; (3) limitations and biases within the evaluation itself; and (4) utilization of evaluation information in the policy process. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Bias, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLysaught, Jerome P.; And Others – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1994
The institutional self-study required by a university hospital's reaccreditation process is explored, with a discussion of benefits and costs. A reaction by C. F. Waltz and A. Belcher reaffirms the value of reaccreditation studies and discusses ways of minimizing costs without compromising comprehensiveness and utility of results. (SLD)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Comprehensive Programs, Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedKlay, William Earle – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1991
Evaluation and strategic management are related in that each attempts to improve the quality of policy decisions and each has evolved from a product-centered focus to one in which implementation and utilization are vital. Evaluators should understand strategic management theory to evaluate its applications appropriately. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewedDehar, Mary-Anne; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1993
Concepts of formative and process evaluation are discussed, and their applications in health promotion and disease prevention are reviewed. Process evaluation fulfills the need for information on program implementation, whereas formative evaluation aims to help develop and improve programs from an early stage. Both evaluations can increase program…
Descriptors: Disease Control, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedChambers, Fred – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1994
The purpose of evaluation in education projects is explored, through examples from English Language Teaching aid projects in developing countries. The distinction between formative and summative evaluation is conceptualized in terms of purpose rather than temporality, and the role of evaluation in program improvement is stressed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Federal Aid
Peer reviewedDraper, Lucy – Children & Society, 2001
Describes as example a parents' center in London to examine impact of evaluation exercises on people and services being evaluated. Questions whether evaluators are measuring the right things, whether evidence is valid, and what effects an evaluation may have on services. Identifies features of research and evaluation that are most likely to…
Descriptors: Children, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Family Programs
Aspen Institute, The, 2007
This year, Congress is scheduled to review the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). In 2002, this law signaled an important change in federal education policy by focusing on accountability for results rather than simple compliance and by seeking to set the performance bar high for all children, regardless of where they live. The time is now to learn…
Descriptors: High Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Change, Charts
Greenwood, Charles R.; Walker, Dale; Hornbeck, Marguerite; Hebbeler, Kathleen; Spiker, Donna – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2007
Policy decision makers, early educators, and early interventionists face numerous challenges as they develop and implement statewide accountability systems to evaluate and improve children's early intervention and early childhood special education outcomes. Kansas was an early adopter of the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) developed by the…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Young Children, Special Education, Accountability
Karp, Stan – Rethinking Schools, 2012
If narrow, test-based evaluation of teachers is unfair, unreliable, and has negative effects on kids, classrooms, and curricula, what's a better approach? By demonizing teachers and unions, and sharply polarizing the education debate, the corporate reform movement has actually undermined serious efforts to improve teacher quality and evaluation.…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Educational Change, Instructional Leadership, Psychometrics
Bers, Trudy – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2012
Surveys and benchmarks continue to grow in importance for community colleges in response to several factors. One is the press for accountability, that is, for colleges to report the outcomes of their programs and services to demonstrate their quality and prudent use of resources, primarily to external constituents and governing boards at the state…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Community Colleges, Accountability, Surveys
Wertheim, Jill A.; Edelson, Daniel C.; Hildebrant, Barbara; Hinde, Elizabeth; Kenney, Marianne; Kolvoord, Robert; Lanegran, David; Marcello, Jody Smothers; Morrill, Robert; Ruiz-Primo, Maria; Seixas, Peter; Shavelson, Richard – Geography Teacher, 2013
In late 2012, both the second edition of the "Geography for Life: National Geography Standards" and the National Science Foundation-funded "Road Map for Geography Education Project" reports were released; the former document describes the conceptual goals for K-12 geography education, and the latter, a route to coordinating reform efforts to…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Instructional Materials, Geography, Educational Change
PDF pending restorationNew Brunswick Labour Force Development Board, Fredericton. – 1995
The evaluative mechanisms in the Department of Advanced Education and Labour and Department of Human Resources Development in the Canadian province of New Brunswick were reviewed. Data were gathered from the following: meetings with key staff in each department, briefing session for all key informants, 19 personal interviews, brief review of the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Adult Education, Continuing Education, Employee Attitudes

Direct link
