NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 30 of 262 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicol, David; Selvaretnam, Geethanjali – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
In two-stage exams, students complete some academic work individually then immediately complete the same work again in small groups. Prior research shows that students perceive the dialogue they engage in at the group stage aids their individual learning. Outcome studies also suggest that engaging in dialogue benefits individual student learning.…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Test Format, Cooperative Learning, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maximilian C. Fink; Larissa J. Kaltefleiter; Isabell Reis; Bernhard Ertl – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2025
This study examines students' format-specific expectations and their preferences toward (1) written multiple-choice examinations, (2) written constructed-response examinations, (3) oral examinations, and (4) standardized practical examinations. N = 509 medical students completed a web-based survey, rating all four examination formats. Preferences…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Medical Students, Preferences, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Silva, Thanuci; Santos, Regiane dos; Mallet, Débora – Journal of Education for Business, 2023
Assuring the quality of education is a concern of learning institutions. To do so, it is necessary to have assertive learning management, with consistent data on students' outcomes. This research provides associate deans and researchers, a roadmap with which to gather evidence to improve the quality of open-ended assessments. Based on statistical…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Business Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Neto, Joana; Neto, Félix; Furnham, Adrian – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
The aim of this study is to examine whether a preference for specific assessment methods in higher education is associated with personality and character strengths. Two-hundred and seventy Portuguese students completed a survey of character strengths, a Big Five personality test and their preference for each of six higher education assessment…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Student Attitudes, Preferences, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Samsa, Gregory – Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2021
Objective: Our master's program in biostatistics requires a qualifying examination (QE). A curriculum review led us to question whether to replace a closed-book format with an open-book one. Our goal was to improve the QE. Methods: This is a case study and commentary, where we describe the evolution of the QE, both in its goals and its content.…
Descriptors: Testing, Cooperative Learning, Evaluation Methods, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cox, Julie; Martin, Angi – Advances in Special Education, 2021
Assessing learning outcomes for students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing presents ongoing challenges given the largely verbal nature of classrooms and the presentation of information. Educators should carefully consider several factors when assessing their students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing. Those factors include, but are not limited to:…
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities, Deafness, Hearing Impairments, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cui, Ying; Chen, Fu; Lutsyk, Alina; Leighton, Jacqueline P.; Cutumisu, Maria – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2023
With the exponential increase in the volume of data available in the 21st century, data literacy skills have become vitally important in work places and everyday life. This paper provides a systematic review of available data literacy assessments targeted at different audiences and educational levels. The results can help researchers and…
Descriptors: Data, Information Literacy, 21st Century Skills, Competence
Deneen, Chris – Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, 2020
This document provides advice on moving from in-place, closed-book examinations to open-book, remote assessment. It offers conceptual considerations, practical tips, and discusses the relative merits of two common approaches to open-book exams: those with strict time limits, and those with broad time limits ('take-home' exams).
Descriptors: Tests, Test Format, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wind, Stefanie A.; Guo, Wenjing – Educational Assessment, 2021
Scoring procedures for the constructed-response (CR) items in large-scale mixed-format educational assessments often involve checks for rater agreement or rater reliability. Although these analyses are important, researchers have documented rater effects that persist despite rater training and that are not always detected in rater agreement and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Responses, Test Items, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lemmo, Alice – International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2021
Comparative studies on paper and pencil--and computer-based tests principally focus on statistical analysis of students' performances. In educational assessment, comparing students' performance (in terms of right or wrong results) does not imply a comparison of problem-solving processes followed by students. In this paper, we present a theoretical…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Janse van Rensburg, Cecile; Coetzee, Stephen A.; Schmulian, Astrid – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
This study reports on the incorporation of mobile instant messaging (MIM) in assessments, as a collaborative learning tool, to enable students to socially construct knowledge and develop their collaborative problem solving competence, while being assessed individually. In particular, this study explores: what is the extent and timing of students'…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Student Evaluation, Peer Relationship, Cooperative Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Qian Liu; Navé Wald; Chandima Daskon; Tony Harland – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2024
This qualitative study looks at multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in examinations and their effectiveness in testing higher-order cognition. While there are claims that MCQs can do this, we consider many assertions problematic because of the difficulty in interpreting what higher-order cognition consists of and whether or not assessment tasks…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Critical Thinking, College Faculty, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Necati Taskin; Kerem Erzurumlu – Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2023
In this study, online test scores and paper-pencil test scores of students studying through online learning were examined. Causal-comparative research was used to determine the distribution of students' test scores and to examine the relationship between them. The participants of the research are freshman students studying in 12 faculties and 8…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scores, Test Format, Paper (Material)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yizhu Gao; Xiaoming Zhai; Min Li; Gyeonggeon Lee; Xiaoxiao Liu – Grantee Submission, 2025
The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming science education by facilitating innovative pedagogical paradigms while raising substantial concerns about scholarly integrity. One particularly pressing issue is the growing risk of student use of GenAI tools to outsource assessment tasks, potentially compromising…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Science Education, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yizhu Gao; Xiaoming Zhai; Min Li; Gyeonggeon Lee; Xiaoxiao Liu – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2025
The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming science education by facilitating innovative pedagogical paradigms while raising substantial concerns about scholarly integrity. One particularly pressing issue is the growing risk of student use of GenAI tools to outsource assessment tasks, potentially compromising…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Science Education, Integrity
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  18