Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 8 |
| Validity | 8 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 6 |
| Cutting Scores | 3 |
| Standards | 3 |
| Academic Standards | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| National Competency Tests | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
| International Journal of… | 1 |
| Online Submission | 1 |
| Review of Educational Research | 1 |
Author
| Giraud, Gerald | 1 |
| Guggenheim, Eric Fries, Ed. | 1 |
| Hertzog, Melody | 1 |
| Impara, James C. | 1 |
| Kane, Michael | 1 |
| Lewis, Jennifer | 1 |
| Lim, Hwanggyu | 1 |
| Mitzel, Howard C. | 1 |
| Padellaro, Frank | 1 |
| Pell, Godfrey | 1 |
| Plake, Barbara S. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| European Union | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lewis, Jennifer; Lim, Hwanggyu; Padellaro, Frank; Sireci, Stephen G.; Zenisky, April L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
Setting cut scores on (MSTs) is difficult, particularly when the test spans several grade levels, and the selection of items from MST panels must reflect the operational test specifications. In this study, we describe, illustrate, and evaluate three methods for mapping panelists' Angoff ratings into cut scores on the scale underlying an MST. The…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Analysis
Impara, James C.; Plake, Barbara S.; Hertzog, Melody; Giraud, Gerald; Spies, Robert – 1998
Judgmental standard setting approaches rely on the perceptions of experts about examinee performance on a test. Traditional standard setting methods ask panelists to estimate how well a randomly selected hypothetical examinee who is representative of a well-defined target group, usually a minimally competent candidate (MCC), will perform on each…
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Judges
Sigmon, Gary L.; And Others – 1983
In recent years educators have been utilizing judgmental methods, such as the ones advocated by Ebel and Angoff, to set minimum competency standards on test items. This study was designed to investigate the reliability and validity of these two procedures in setting minimum levels of performance on 175 vocational evaluator competency statements.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Minimum Competencies
Pell, Godfrey; Roberts, T. E. – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2006
The increase in litigation by students who are dissatisfied with their assessment, and to a lesser extent the time and monetary costs of student appeals makes it imperative that institutions adopt a robust assessment strategy. The concern of consumers with respect to professional services offered by students after graduation is also an issue. This…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Standard Setting, Medical Education, Evaluation Methods
Yang, Wen-Ling – 2000
The Achievement-Levels Setting (ALS) process for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) resulted in numerical cutscores on the NAEP score scale representing the performance standards for three achievement levels: Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. This paper focuses on an important, but less researched, aspect of the standard setting…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Civics, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedKane, Michael – Review of Educational Research, 1994
A framework is provided for examining the validity of performance standards for high-stakes achievement tests. Assumptions that need to be evaluated are that the passing score corresponds to specified performance standards and that the specified standard is reasonable given the purpose of the decision. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criteria, Cutting Scores, Decision Making
Schulz, E. Matthew; Mitzel, Howard C. – Online Submission, 2005
A new standard setting method, Mapmark, was recently developed by ACT Inc. in the course of a contract with the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) to set achievement levels for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in Grade 12 mathematics. Mapmark includes elements of the bookmark method (Lewis, Mitzel, & Green, 1996;…
Descriptors: Validity, Standard Setting (Scoring), Formative Evaluation, Grade 12
Guggenheim, Eric Fries, Ed. – 2002
This document contains papers from a 2-day meeting on identification, evaluation, and recognition of nonformal learning in the European Union. The following papers are included: "Identification, Assessment, and Recognition of Non-Formal Learning: European Tendencies" (Jens Bjornavold); "Why Measure Human Capital?" (Riel…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Adult Learning, Comparative Analysis, Competence

Direct link
