NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 77 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wingate, Lori A.; Robertson, Kelly; FitzGerald, Michael; Rucks, Lana; Tsuzaki, Takara; Clasen, Carla; Schwob, Jeremy – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
In this study, we investigated the impact of the evaluation capacity building (ECB) efforts of an organization by examining the evaluation plans included in funding proposals over a 14-year period. Specifically, we sought to determine the degree to which and how evaluation plans in proposals to one National Science Foundation (NSF) program changed…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Capacity Building, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pupik Dean, Christopher G.; Schein, Maggie; Kang, Sheena; Kidd, David; Webb, Mel; Doyle, Annie Walton; Allen, Danielle – Teachers College Record, 2020
Background/Context: In recent years, the humanities have frequently been described as "under attack" or "in crisis" in both popular media and academic writing. In this climate, it is particularly critical to develop a stronger understanding of the value of the humanities. While there are many theoretical arguments about their…
Descriptors: Humanities, Learning Theories, Grantsmanship, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Biegelbauer, Peter; Palfinger, Thomas; Mayer, Sabine – Research Evaluation, 2020
Innovation agencies, that is organizations with the primary focus of funding applied research and technological development, evaluate project proposals to select the most promising proposals for funding. At the moment, there is only little verified knowledge available on project evaluation and selection processes of innovation agencies. We want to…
Descriptors: Innovation, Program Proposals, Selection Criteria, Evaluators
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 2024
This report documents two distinct stages of decision-making regarding new charter school proposals. The first is a "development" decision which includes the following: (1) further study of a new charter school; (2) considering participation in a charter consortium; or (3) study of a federal Charter Schools Program grant or subgrant for…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, State Surveys, State Legislation, Institutional Autonomy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sanzo, Karen – International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 2016
This article presents a content analysis of the 2013 School Leadership Program (SLP) grants. SLP projects provide a unique opportunity for participants in the field to explore innovative leadership preparation and development and their impact on program participants, schools, school districts, and students. The article begins with an overview of…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Program Proposals, Leadership Training, Administrator Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dean-Coffey, Jara – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
An increasing number of foundations are embracing racial equity/equity as a core value, and it is influencing how they see themselves and operate. However, evaluation has for the most part remained untouched. Knowing how race/racism has influenced both, philanthropy and evaluation, deepens our understanding of how philanthropic evaluation practice…
Descriptors: Race, Equal Education, Racial Bias, Private Financial Support
Reform Support Network, 2012
This publication offers SEAs and LEAs steps for evaluating a Request for Proposal (RFP) that allows input from a wide range of participants and specific subject matter experts, permits flexibility and weighted scoring in appropriate areas and provides an objective and defensible process for determining the vendor finalist.
Descriptors: Program Proposals, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Weighted Scores
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (NJ1), 2012
These protocols represent a working guide for planning and implementing national sample assessments in connection with the national Key Performance Measures (KPMs). The protocols are intended for agencies involved in planning or conducting national sample assessments and personnel responsible for administering associated tenders or contracts,…
Descriptors: Scientific Literacy, Protocol Analysis, Sampling, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sanzo, Karen L. – Planning and Changing, 2012
This study is a content analysis of selected federally funded leadership preparation program evaluation proposals for the 2008, 2009, and 2010 School Leadership Program grants. The United States Department of Education (USDE) began awarding funding in 2002 to develop and implement preparation programs for aspiring and current assistant principals…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Program Proposals, Federal Aid, Content Analysis
Russell, Michael; Kavanaugh, Maureen – IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2011
The importance of student assessment, particularly for summative purposes, has increased greatly over the past thirty years. At the same time, emphasis on including all students in assessment programs has also increased. Assessment programs, whether they are large-scale, district-based, or teacher developed, have traditionally attempted to assess…
Descriptors: Testing Accommodations, Testing Programs, Educational Assessment, Adaptive Testing
Lynch, Kathleen Bodisch – 1987
Current practice in educational program evaluation was examined through analyses of 232 reports submitted, from 1980 to 1983, by institutions seeking approval for their programs from the U.S. Department of Education's Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP). The JDRP reviews these reports to determine whether educational programs have demonstrated…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Effect Size, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Hamilton, Jack A. – 1979
The Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP) was established in 1972 by the Education Division of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to review projects that seek federal funding for nationwide dissemination. Since very few career education programs have been represented among the exemplary programs approved by JDRP, a project was…
Descriptors: Career Education, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Lynch, Kathleen Bodisch – 1986
Educational programs and evaluations which were submitted to the Department of Education's Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP), in order to be named validated programs, were studied to identify program characteristics associated with large versus small effect size. Effect size was calculated for 165 out of 232 submittals reviewed by JDRP from…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. Right to Read Program. – 1972
The United States Commissioner of Education asked the Right to Read Office to develop a means to examine systematically existing reading programs or proposals for developing reading programs. This request reflected three needs: (1) to help communities develop reading instruction programs that meet the needs of learners within those communities;…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Lieberman, A. J.; Wirt, John G. – 1972
This work has been done as part of the effort to plan the National Institute of Education (NIE). The report, one of a series, describes a management plan recommended for the Basic Research Division of the proposed National Institute of Education. The plan was developed following a survey of management practices in a number of federal agencies…
Descriptors: Agencies, Archives, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6