Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 6 |
| Performance Factors | 6 |
| Systems Development | 6 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 2 |
| Management Information Systems | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| State Programs | 2 |
| Systems Analysis | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Carl D Perkins Vocational and… | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Flaherty, John, Jr.; Sobolew-Shubin, Alexandria; Heredia, Alberto; Chen-Gaddini, Min; Klarin, Becca; Finkelstein, Neal D. – WestEd, 2014
Math in Common® (MiC) is a five-year initiative that supports a formal network of 10 California school districts as they implement the Common Core State Standards in mathematics (CCSS-M) across grades K-8. As the MiC initiative moves into its second year, one of the central activities that each of the districts is undergoing to support CCSS…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Formative Evaluation, Program Implementation, Middle Schools
New Teacher Project, 2012
This fall, the nine states that finished as runners up in last year's groundbreaking Race to the Top competition will have an opportunity to reapply for a grant. The winners will receive a combined $200 million to help implement the bold education reform plans they developed last year. Many of the eligible states already have clear roadmaps toward…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Educational Change, Investment, Evaluation Methods
Chevalier, Roger – Performance and Instruction, 1994
Explains how to create an organizational system that will result in good performance. Topics discussed include process versus system; two views of a system, i.e., mechanistic and organic; and components of a system, including performance guides, measurement of results, feedback, and training. (LRW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Feedback, Organizational Theories, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedDominick, Wayne D. – Information Processing and Management, 1987
Describes the concept of an integrated environment which allows managers to evaluate and measure the performance of computer based information systems. Both system efficiency evaluation and user interaction evaluation are addressed, and MADAM, a system currently operational at the University of Southwestern Louisiana, is briefly described.…
Descriptors: Data Processing, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Integrated Activities
Griffiths, C. – 1994
The Annual Performance Report submitted by each state to the Office of Vocational and Adult Education was used to monitor what states have developed and how and to what extent states have implemented their accountability system. The following findings of this analysis are synthesized in this report: (1) 32 states require evaluation of all programs…
Descriptors: Education Work Relationship, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization
Moloney, Daniel P.; Grotevant, Susan M. – 1997
In response to changing management and budgetary strategies that have been driving decision making to the lowest administrative levels, institutional researchers have been attempting to identify indicators which can be used to evaluate institutional performance and progress. This paper reviews efforts to introduce departmental operational…
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Decision Support Systems


