Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 5 |
| Participant Satisfaction | 5 |
| Program Design | 5 |
| Program Evaluation | 4 |
| Staff Development | 3 |
| Educational Objectives | 2 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Assistive Technology | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer System Design | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Choi, Young Mi | 1 |
| Crosby, Jeanie | 1 |
| Hawley, Robert C. | 1 |
| Hruska, Merrita | 1 |
| Little, Judith Warren | 1 |
| Sprigle, Stephen H. | 1 |
| Suchart Homjan | 1 |
| Wanida Homjan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Thailand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Suchart Homjan; Wanida Homjan – International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2025
This research aimed to investigate and develop an online system for educational measurement and evaluation with a focus on authentic assessment. The research process consisted of four main stages: (1) analyzing the current state and carrying out qualitative interviews on authentic assessment, (2) developing an online measurement and evaluation…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Evaluation, Computer Uses in Education, Computer Assisted Testing
Choi, Young Mi; Sprigle, Stephen H. – Assistive Technology, 2011
User input is an important component to help guide designers in producing a more usable product. Evaluation of prototypes is one method of obtaining this input, but methods for evaluating assistive technology prototypes during design have not been adequately described or evaluated. This project aimed to compare different methods of evaluating…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewedLittle, Judith Warren – Journal of Staff Development, 1982
Staff development programs and evaluation designs can be improved by applying four principles: (1) Range of evaluation criteria should match range of outcomes; (2) Program outcomes should be concrete and specific to assist in formulation of evaluation criteria; (3) Evaluation design rigor should reflect the program's power; and (4) Evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Outcomes of Education
Peer reviewedCrosby, Jeanie – Journal of Staff Development, 1982
Six areas of staff development program evaluation in which participants may be meaningfully involved are: (1) clarification of the program's goals; (2) development of a design for the evaluation study; (3) development of methods for measurement; (4) analysis of information; (5) response to evaluation instruments; and (6) reporting on an evaluation…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedHruska, Merrita; Hawley, Robert C. – Journal of Staff Development, 1982
A seven-part sequence for evaluation of a teacher center includes: (1) determining the purpose of evaluation; (2) identifying decision makers; (3) identifying areas of concern to decision makers; (4) determining what information is necessary to make decisions; (5) determining the means of collecting information; (6) organizing and using the…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Decision Making, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria

Direct link
