Descriptor
| Ability Identification | 9 |
| Evaluation Methods | 9 |
| Intelligence Differences | 9 |
| Cognitive Ability | 7 |
| Gifted | 7 |
| Individual Characteristics | 7 |
| Definitions | 6 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 6 |
| Talent | 6 |
| Talent Development | 6 |
| Children | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Borland, James H. | 1 |
| Detterman, Douglas K. | 1 |
| Edelman, Steve | 1 |
| Feldman, David Henry | 1 |
| Gagne, Francoys | 1 |
| Hany, Ernst A. | 1 |
| Robinson, Nancy M. | 1 |
| Ruthsatz, Joanne | 1 |
| Sternberg, Robert J. | 1 |
| Tava, Edward G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Opinion Papers | 7 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBorland, James H. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the previous article, which proposed a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Takes issue with the distinction made between natural abilities and systematically developed abilities, and thus the distinction between giftedness and talent. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedDetterman, Douglas K.; Ruthsatz, Joanne – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the initial article in this issue that proposes a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Suggests a more comprehensive theory of elite performance composed of three components: general intelligence, domain-specific skills, and practice. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedHany, Ernst A. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the initial article in this issue that proposes a set of 22 statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Argues that a comprehensive rationale is missing, particularly an explanation of developmental mechanisms, of learning processes, and of the dynamics of gene/environment interaction. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedGagne, Francoys – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
This rejoinder to articles responding to a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents presented in this issue's initial article, defends the validity and usefulness of the distinction between high natural abilities (gifts) and high systematically developed ones (talents) as compared…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedSternberg, Robert J. – Roeper Review, 2000
This article presents an analysis of patterns of giftedness based on the triarchic theory of intelligence. The analysis distinguishes among seven different patterns of giftedness and includes: the Analyzer, the Creator, the Practitioner, the Analytical Creator, the Analytical Practitioners, the Creative Practitioner, and the Consummate Balancer.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adults, Children, Classification
Peer reviewedFeldman, David Henry – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the initial article in this issue that proposes a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Offers an alternative psychometric, quantitative perspective that sees gifts as broad, general analytic capabilities, and talents as specific, content-bound capabilities. (CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedRobinson, Nancy M. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to this issue's initial article that presents 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Suggests putting aside the terms "gifted" and "talented," creating a hierarchical or categorical list of abilities, and downplaying the dichotomous conceptualization of nature and nurture.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedEdelman, Steve – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1996
The third edition of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III) is reviewed. A comparison of the WISC-III with the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) is included. Discusses shortcomings of the WISC-III while noting that overall, there are substantial improvements in the WISC-III over the WISC-R. (KW)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Aptitude Tests, Children, Comparative Analysis
Tava, Edward G. – 1971
This research is, in part, a study of a method of differentiating between two different types of retardation (the exogenous or brain injured and the endogenous or non-brain injured). However, this paper is also an example of the evaluation of a research problem, for it incorporates data and information from three different studies, each of which…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Abstract Reasoning, Diagnostic Tests, Evaluation Methods


