Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Construct Validity | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Least Squares Statistics | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSlocum-Gori, Suzanne L.; Zumbo, Bruno D. – Social Indicators Research, 2011
Whenever one uses a composite scale score from item responses, one is tacitly assuming that the scale is dominantly unidimensional. Investigating the unidimensionality of item response data is an essential component of construct validity. Yet, there is no universally accepted technique or set of rules to determine the number of factors to retain…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Construct Validity, Measures (Individuals), Hypothesis Testing
Visser, Beth A.; Ashton, Michael C.; Vernon, Philip A. – Intelligence, 2006
Gardner [Gardner, H. (2006-this issue). On failing to grasp the core of MI theory: A response to Visser et al. "Intelligence"] criticized some aspects of our empirical examination [Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006-this issue). Beyond "g": Putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. "Intelligence"] of his "Theory of…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Multiple Intelligences, Hypothesis Testing, Individual Differences
