Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Graduate Students | 3 |
| Research Problems | 3 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Quality Control | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Education Majors | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Family (Sociological Unit) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| China | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zi-Gang Ge; Yuanyuan Zhao; Yong Liu – Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2024
This paper tries to probe the common quality issues in academic master theses of education majors and propose some possible countermeasures. The study sampled and evaluated 275 academic master theses of education majors in China to examine common quality issues in them, and used a questionnaire to survey 210 academic master's degree candidates of…
Descriptors: Education Majors, Masters Theses, Graduate Students, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedGanong, Lawrence H.; Coleman, Marilyn – Family Relations, 1993
Sees important aspect of graduate education as learning how to evaluate quality and validity of research. Notes that study of families presents particular challenges. Examines three methods to teach students to critique family research. Sees all three as holding promise in teaching students how to evaluate family research and notes that all three…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Family (Sociological Unit), Graduate Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMcGrath, William E. – Library Quarterly, 1993
Argues that perception studies and ranking are lacking in validity and reliability because of small sample size, simplistic statistical analyses, and the evaluation of quality by educators. It is asserted that quality control is more valid when evaluated by the customers of education, i.e., the students. (11 references) (EA)
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students, Higher Education


