NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Noland, Carey M. – Journal of Research Practice, 2012
When conducting research on sensitive topics, it is challenging to use new methods of data collection given the apprehensions of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). This is especially worrying because sensitive topics of research often require novel approaches. In this article a brief personal history of navigating the IRB process for conducting…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Sexuality, Social Science Research, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Worthen, Blaine – Evaluation Practice, 1995
It is argued that reports of evaluation activities often leave much to be desired because they fail to portray the real trial-and-error processes of the research study and do not report on the logic in use at the time of the inquiry. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Experiments, Logic
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harman, Donna – Information Processing and Management, 1992
Six articles about evaluating information retrieval (IR) systems and methods are briefly described in this introduction to a special issue and some of the major problems that are encountered in evaluating interactive information retrieval are considered. (two references) (LAE)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Experiments, Information Retrieval, Online Searching
Food and Drug Administration (DHEW), Washington, DC. – 1979
These guidelines are intended to help those who design and conduct investigations of psychopharmacologic agents in children. A progression of studies in four phases is advocated. First, early short term studies should establish single and multiple dose safety baselines. Second, early pilot efficacy studies may be initiated jointly with longer…
Descriptors: Children, Drug Therapy, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Saretsky, Gary – 1975
The paper describes an unacknowledged artifact that may confound experimental evaluations of innovations. The paper hypothesizes that control group members (teachers, pupils, etc.) perceiving the consequences of an innovation as threatening to their job, salary, status, or traditional patterns of working, may perform atypically and confound the…
Descriptors: Bias, Change Strategies, Control Groups, Educational Innovation