NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
McNair, Daniel J.; Curry, Toi L. – Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2013
This review of current writing assessment practices focuses upon the adult population, an area significantly underrepresented within psychoeducational literature. As compared to other populations, such as K-12 students, there are few options for the practitioner wishing to evaluate adult writers by means of standardized assessment instruments.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, College Students, Writing Skills, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silverman, William H.; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1986
Examined how assessment center methods affect the way assessors organize and process assessment center information and affect the ratings they make. Results suggested that methods for evaluating assessment center candidates affected the way the assessors organized the assessment center information and affected the obtained ratings. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Cognitive Processes, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zedeck, Sheldon; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1983
Studied interviewer reliability, validity, and strategy for information integration. Candidates (N=412) for selection to a military division were interviewed and assessed. Results indicated that interviewers functioned in a similar fashion. Analyses of individual interviewers indicated higher reliability and individual differences among…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Employment Interviews, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meier, Anne; Spada, Hans; Rummel, Nikol – International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007
The analysis of the process of collaboration is a central topic in current CSCL research. However, defining process characteristics relevant for collaboration quality and developing instruments capable of assessing these characteristics are no trivial tasks. In the assessment method presented in this paper, nine qualitatively defined dimensions of…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Cooperation, Content Analysis, Cognitive Processes
McGinty, Dixie; Neel, John H. – 1996
A new standard setting approach is introduced, called the cognitive components approach. Like the Angoff method, the cognitive components method generates minimum pass levels (MPLs) for each item. In both approaches, the item MPLs are summed for each judge, then averaged across judges to yield the standard. In the cognitive components approach,…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Methods, Grade 3
McGinty, Dixie; Neel, John H.; Hsu, Yu-Sheng – 1996
The cognitive components standard setting method, recently introduced by D. McGinty and J. Neel (1996), asks judges to specify minimum levels of performance not for the test items, but for smaller portions of items, the component skills and concepts required to answer each item correctly. Items are decomposed into these components before judges…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2012
The IADIS CELDA 2012 Conference intention was to address the main issues concerned with evolving learning processes and supporting pedagogies and applications in the digital age. There had been advances in both cognitive psychology and computing that have affected the educational arena. The convergence of these two disciplines is increasing at a…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Academic Support Services, Access to Computers