NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)0
Since 2007 (last 20 years)39
Source
New Directions for Evaluation149
Audience
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
Showing 1 to 15 of 149 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nord, Derek – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
With the vast array of contextual factors, pedagogical approaches, models of implementation, and purposes of education and training related to online learning, educators, learners, and the general public alike are seeking answers regarding utility and effectiveness of online learning. This article identifies and responds to many of the challenges…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Online Courses, Computer Uses in Education, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A.; Rohmer-Hirt, Johnna A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
From the 1980s to the present, educational accountability in the United States has grown dramatically. Such accountability in U.S. school districts, although driven primarily by external demands, has internal manifestations as well. The chapter traces the historical development of internal evaluation in American school districts, then highlights…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Testing Programs, Standardized Tests, School Districts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zantal-Wiener, Kathy; Horwood, Thomas J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2010
The authors propose a comprehensive evaluation framework to prepare for evaluating school emergency management programs. This framework involves a logic model that incorporates Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures as a foundation for comprehensive evaluation that complements performance monitoring used by the U.S. Department of…
Descriptors: Models, Logical Thinking, Emergency Programs, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roseland, Denise; Volkov, Boris B.; Callow-Heusser, Catherine – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In contrast to typical National Science Foundation program evaluations, the Utah State Math Science Partnership-Research, Evaluation and Technical Assistance Project (MSP-RETA) provided technical assistance (TA) in two forms: direct TA for up to 10 projects a year, and professional development sessions for a larger number of project staff. Not…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Mathematics, Sciences, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feinstein, Osvaldo Nestor – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
Evaluation of programs or projects is often perceived as a threat. This is to a great extent related to the anticipated use of evaluation for accountability, which is often prioritized at the expense of using evaluation as a learning tool. Frequently it is argued that there is a trade-off between these two evaluation functions. An alternative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Accountability, Program Evaluation, Research Tools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zeller-Berkman, Sarah – New Directions for Evaluation, 2010
A critical theory lens is used to explore the role of evaluation in youth development, a field aimed at recognizing youth as assets. A theory of change in the field is questioned for its emphasis on individual youth outcomes as programmatic outcome measures. A review of 209 evaluations of 131 programs in the Harvard Family Research Project's…
Descriptors: Critical Theory, Youth Programs, Evaluation, Outcomes of Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alkin, Marvin C.; Vo, Anne T.; Christie, Christina A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The act of valuing in an evaluation may be perceived in different ways. We consider the multiple theoretic perspectives that govern an evaluator's behavior and present a typology of evaluator valuing roles. Within this typology we describe three ways in which value judgments are typically reached--by stakeholders alone, stakeholders and evaluators…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Classification, Value Judgment, Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mathison, Sandra – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
The author analyzes the growth and nature of internal evaluation from the 1960s to the present and suggests that internal evaluation has been on the increase because of its perceived importance. Although the 1960s were characterized by a rich intellectual development of evaluation theory and practice, the fiscal conservatism of the 1980s ushered…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Accountability, Public Administration, Political Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guillen-Woods, Blanca Flor; Kaiser, Monica A.; Harrington, Maura J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is usually understood in relation to schools and districts, but the legislation has also affected community-based organizations that operate school-linked programs. This case study of an after-school program in California demonstrates how educational accountability systems that emphasize students' academic…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, After School Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hendricks, Michael; Plantz, Margaret C.; Pritchard, Kathleen J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
In 1996, United Way of America (UWA) developed and began disseminating the most widely used approach to program outcome measurement in the nonprofit sector. Today an estimated 450 local United Ways encourage approximately 19,000 local agencies they fund to measure outcomes. The authors first describe and then assess the strengths and limitations…
Descriptors: Nonprofit Organizations, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Community Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Toal, Stacie A.; Gullickson, Arlen R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
In 1999, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded funds to the Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University to conduct an external evaluation of the Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program. ATE, a federally mandated program designed to increase the number and quality of skilled technicians in the U.S. workforce, has funded over 346…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Technology Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; King, Jean A.; Ooms, Ann – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
A cross-case analysis of four National Science Foundation (NSF) case studies identified both unique details and common themes related to promoting the use and influence of multisite evaluations. The analysis provided evidence of diverse evaluation use by stakeholders and suggested that people taking part in the multisite evaluations perceived…
Descriptors: Role Perception, Participation, Case Studies, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hoole, Emily; Patterson, Tracy E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The authors present the argument that evaluation as currently practiced is failing the needs of the social sector, if the goal is to help organizations achieve their mission. Three case studies are presented in which evaluation played a key role in the development of a learning culture within the organization. Each case highlights the positive…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Philanthropic Foundations, Evaluation Methods, Organizational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patton, Michael Quinn – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Extension and evaluation share some similar challenges, including working with diverse stakeholders, parallel processes for focusing priorities, meeting common standards of excellence, and adapting to globalization, new technologies, and changing times. Evaluations of extension programs have helped clarify how change occurs, especially the…
Descriptors: Program Development, Global Approach, Evaluation Criteria, Extension Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lambur, Michael T. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
This chapter explores how the structure of large complex organizations such as Cooperative Extension affects their ability to support internal evaluation of their programs and activities. Following a literature review of organizational structure and its relation to internal evaluation capacity, the chapter presents the results of interviews with…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Extension Education, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10