NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 830 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mary Kamela – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2024
This chapter discusses the history of source evaluation methods within the ever-changing field of information literacy, including a critical assessment of one popular approach, the CRAAP Test. The author then endorses an alternative approach, lateral reading, which encourages students to engage more deeply when evaluating digital resources in an…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Credibility, Information Literacy, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tavares, Walter; Kinnear, Benjamin; Schumacher, Daniel J.; Forte, Milena – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2023
In this perspective, the authors critically examine "rater training" as it has been conceptualized and used in medical education. By "rater training," they mean the educational events intended to "improve" rater performance and contributions during assessment events. Historically, rater training programs have focused…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Interrater Reliability, Evaluation Methods, Training
Soubhik Barari; Ji Eun Park; Susan Paddock – NORC at the University of Chicago, 2025
Rankings of international higher education institutions have become influential, newsworthy metrics worldwide. This is unsurprising given the rising prevalence of cross-national college attendance. This report evaluates the methodologies of three major international ranking systems: the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU, or…
Descriptors: Reputation, Institutional Evaluation, Colleges, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kinarsky, Alana R.; Christie, Christina A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Since 2007, two taxonomies have been proposed to identify the components of evaluation practice that may be specified in an evaluation policy. Little is known, however, about how these taxonomies align with evaluation policies developed by philanthropic foundations. Through thematic analysis, this article first compares 12 foundation evaluation…
Descriptors: Taxonomy, Evaluation Methods, Philanthropic Foundations, Educational Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mostafa M. Samy; Mohamed A. Metwally; Mahmoud Ashry; Wael M. Elmayyah – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2025
Gas Turbine Engines (GTE) have the highest power-to-weight ratio among Internal Combustion Engines (ICE). Its modularity and ability to utilize various types of fuel make it highly recommended in power plants, naval transportation, and, of course, the most equipped in aviation. The lack of GTEs' real data is increasing a recognized need for…
Descriptors: Engines, Power Technology, Data Collection, Data Interpretation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daryl Close – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
For decades, student ratings of university faculty have been used by administrators in high stakes faculty employment decisions such as tenure, promotion, contract renewal and reappointment, and merit pay. However, virtually no attention has been paid to the ethical questions of using ratings in employment decisions. Instead, the ratings…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Ethics, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huey T. Chen; Liliana Morosanu; Victor H. Chen – Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024
The Campbellian validity typology has been used as a foundation for outcome evaluation and for developing evidence-based interventions for decades. As such, randomized control trials were preferred for outcome evaluation. However, some evaluators disagree with the validity typology's argument that randomized controlled trials as the best design…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Systems Approach, Intervention, Evidence Based Practice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jeffrey Matayoshi; Eric Cosyn; Christopher Lechuga; Hasan Uzun – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2024
ALEKS is an adaptive learning and assessment system, with courses covering subjects such as math, chemistry, and statistics. In this work, we focus on the ALEKS math courses, which cover a wide range of content starting at second grade math and continuing through college-level precalculus. To help instructors and students navigate this content,…
Descriptors: Student Placement, Evaluation Methods, Elementary Secondary Education, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Silva, Thanuci; Santos, Regiane dos; Mallet, Débora – Journal of Education for Business, 2023
Assuring the quality of education is a concern of learning institutions. To do so, it is necessary to have assertive learning management, with consistent data on students' outcomes. This research provides associate deans and researchers, a roadmap with which to gather evidence to improve the quality of open-ended assessments. Based on statistical…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Business Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ole J. Kemi – Advances in Physiology Education, 2025
Students are assessed by coursework and/or exams, all of which are marked by assessors (markers). Student and marker performances are then subject to end-of-session board of examiner handling and analysis. This occurs annually and is the basis for evaluating students but also the wider learning and teaching efficiency of an academic institution.…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Academic Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelly, Kate Tremain; Richardson, Mary; Isaacs, Talia – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Comparative judgment is gaining popularity as an assessment tool, including for high-stakes testing purposes, despite relatively little research on the use of the technique. Advocates claim two main rationales for its use: that comparative judgment is valid because humans are better at comparative than absolute judgment, and because it distils the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nisbet, Isabel; Shaw, Stuart – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Fairness in assessment has become increasingly topical and controversial in recent years. Assessment theoreticians are writing more about fairness and assessment practitioners have developed processes and good practice to minimise unfairness. There is also increased scrutiny by students, parents and the wider public--not only of the fairness of…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Test Bias, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dorsey, David W.; Michaels, Hillary R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
We have dramatically advanced our ability to create rich, complex, and effective assessments across a range of uses through technology advancement. Artificial Intelligence (AI) enabled assessments represent one such area of advancement--one that has captured our collective interest and imagination. Scientists and practitioners within the domains…
Descriptors: Validity, Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meghan Littlejohn; Edwin Maas – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2024
Background: 'Speech sound disorder' is an umbrella term that encompasses dysarthria, articulation disorders, childhood apraxia of speech and phonological disorders. However, differential diagnosis between these disorders is a persistent challenge in speech pathology, as many diagnostic procedures use symptom clusters instead of identifying an…
Descriptors: Speech Impairments, Phonology, Clinical Diagnosis, Speech Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jack Barbera; Jordan Harshman; Regis Komperda – Journal of Chemical Education, 2023
To facilitate the chemistry education community in locating and evaluating published assessment instruments, the Chemistry Instrument Review and Assessment Library (CHIRAL) encompasses a number of resources. First and foremost, CHIRAL contains a catalog of over 500 assessment instruments that is easily searchable, allowing for the identification…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Evaluation Methods, Educational Resources, Libraries
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  56