Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Elementary Secondary Education | 8 |
| Readability Formulas | 8 |
| Reliability | 8 |
| Reading Research | 5 |
| Readability | 4 |
| Validity | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Measurement Instruments | 3 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 2 |
| Analytical Criticism | 1 |
| Cloze Procedure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Carver, Ronald P. | 2 |
| Crismore, Avon | 1 |
| Fitzgerald, Gisela G. | 1 |
| Fuchs, Lynn S. | 1 |
| Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck | 1 |
| Kibby, Michael W. | 1 |
| Stevens, Kathleen C. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Kindergarten | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Fry Readability Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck – Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2019
This article examines how English as a foreign language learners might be better matched to reading texts using automatic readability analysis. Specifically, I examine how the lexical decoding component of readability might be validated. In Japan, readability has been mostly determined by publishers or by professional reading organizations who…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Computational Linguistics
Peer reviewedFitzgerald, Gisela G. – Journal of Reading, 1981
Research indicates that three samples may not give a good indication of a workbook's narrative readability level. (MKM)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Research, Reliability
Peer reviewedStevens, Kathleen C. – Reading Teacher, 1980
Reports that the McCall-Crabbs Standard Test Lessons in Reading were never sufficiently standardized to justify their widespread use as the basis for readability formulae. (DD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Research, Reliability
Peer reviewedCarver, Ronald P. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1975
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Peer reviewedCarver, Ronald P. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1975
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Fuchs, Lynn S.; And Others – 1983
The purposes of this study were to assess the usefulness of a variety of readability formulas in predicting the relative difficulty of passages, and to explore the contribution of pupils' background to text difficulty. Subjects were 285 special education students in grades 1-9, 117 of whom were based in rural and suburban Minnesota (MN) and 168 of…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Elementary Secondary Education, Predictive Measurement, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedKibby, Michael W. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1975
Descriptors: Analytical Criticism, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Literature Reviews
Crismore, Avon – 1981
The purpose of this paper is to make classroom teachers on all educational levels aware of the limitations of readability formulas and the factors affecting readability that are not accounted for by the readability formulas. delineated in discussions of readability formula assumptions, problems, and limitations. Some of the specific factors that…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Measurement Techniques, Performance Factors, Readability


