NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations1
Showing 1 to 15 of 29 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leckie, George; Prior, Lucy – School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2022
School accountability systems increasingly hold schools to account for their performances using value-added models purporting to measure the effects of schools on student learning. The most common approach is to fit a linear regression of student current achievement on student prior achievement, where the school effects are the school means of the…
Descriptors: Value Added Models, Accountability, Secondary Schools, Educational Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2020
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an initiative of the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences (IES), which was established under the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. It is an important part of IES's strategy to use rigorous and relevant research, evaluation, and statistics to improve the nation's education system.…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Evidence, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Slavin, Robert E.; Cheung, Alan C. K. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2017
Large-scale randomized studies provide the best means of evaluating practical, replicable approaches to improving educational outcomes. This article discusses the advantages, problems, and pitfalls of these evaluations, focusing on alternative methods of randomization, recruitment, ensuring high-quality implementation, dealing with attrition, and…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evaluation Methods, Recruitment, Attrition (Research Studies)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2017
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) systematic review process is the basis of many of its products, enabling the WWC to use consistent, objective, and transparent standards and procedures in its reviews, while also ensuring comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. The WWC systematic review process consists of five steps: (1) Developing…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Evidence, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Citkowicz, Martyna; Hedges, Larry V. – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2013
In some instances, intentionally or not, study designs are such that there is clustering in one group but not in the other. This paper describes methods for computing effect size estimates and their variances when there is clustering in only one group and the analysis has not taken that clustering into account. The authors provide the effect size…
Descriptors: Multivariate Analysis, Effect Size, Sampling, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Levin, Joel R.; Lall, Venessa F.; Kratochwill, Thomas R. – Journal of School Psychology, 2011
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the statistical properties of two extensions of the Levin-Wampold (1999) single-case simultaneous start-point model's comparative effectiveness randomization test. The two extensions were (a) adapting the test to situations where there are more than two different intervention conditions and (b)…
Descriptors: Intervention, Validity, Statistical Significance, Effect Size
Fong, Anthony B.; Finkelstein, Neal D.; Jaeger, Laura M.; Diaz, Rebeca; Broek, Marie E. – WestEd, 2015
The Expository Reading and Writing Course (ERWC) was developed by California State University (CSU) faculty and high school educators to improve the academic literacy of high school seniors, thereby reducing the need for students to enroll in remedial English courses upon entering college. This report, produced by Innovation Studies at WestEd,…
Descriptors: Expository Writing, Course Evaluation, High School Seniors, Grade 12
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2014
This "What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 3.0)" provides a detailed description of the standards and procedures of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). The remaining chapters of this Handbook are organized to take the reader through the basic steps that the WWC uses to develop a review protocol, identify…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Guides, Intervention, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fukkink, Ruben Georges; Trienekens, Noortje; Kramer, Lisa J. C. – Educational Psychology Review, 2011
This meta-analysis demonstrates that the video feedback method has a statistically significant effect on the interaction skills of professionals in a range of contact professions. The aggregate effect, calculated on the basis of 217 experimental comparisons from 33 experimental studies involving a total of 1,058 people, was 0.40 standard deviation…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Meta Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Serlin, Ronald C. – Psychological Methods, 2010
The sense that replicability is an important aspect of empirical science led Killeen (2005a) to define "p[subscript rep]," the probability that a replication will result in an outcome in the same direction as that found in a current experiment. Since then, several authors have praised and criticized 'p[subscript rep]," culminating…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Effect Size, Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cumming, Geoff – Psychological Methods, 2010
This comment offers three descriptions of "p[subscript rep]" that start with a frequentist account of confidence intervals, draw on R. A. Fisher's fiducial argument, and do not make Bayesian assumptions. Links are described among "p[subscript rep]," "p" values, and the probability a confidence interval will capture…
Descriptors: Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques, Research Methodology, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2011
With its critical assessments of scientific evidence on the effectiveness of education programs, policies, and practices (referred to as "interventions"), and a range of products summarizing this evidence, the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an important part of the Institute of Education Sciences' strategy to use rigorous and relevant…
Descriptors: Standards, Access to Information, Information Management, Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thompson, Bruce – Psychology in the Schools, 2007
The present article provides a primer on (a) effect sizes, (b) confidence intervals, and (c) confidence intervals for effect sizes. Additionally, various admonitions for reformed statistical practice are presented. For example, a very important implication of the realization that there are dozens of effect size statistics is that "authors must…
Descriptors: Intervals, Effect Size, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erceg-Hurn, David M.; Mirosevich, Vikki M. – American Psychologist, 2008
Classic parametric statistical significance tests, such as analysis of variance and least squares regression, are widely used by researchers in many disciplines, including psychology. For classic parametric tests to produce accurate results, the assumptions underlying them (e.g., normality and homoscedasticity) must be satisfied. These assumptions…
Descriptors: Statistical Significance, Least Squares Statistics, Effect Size, Statistical Studies
Taylor, Dianne L. – 1991
As significance testing comes under increasing criticism, some researchers are turning to other indices to evaluate their findings. Included among the alternative options are the interpretation of effect size estimates and the evaluation of sample specificity (invariance testing). Using a hypothetical data set of 64 cases and two predictor…
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Effect Size, Evaluation Methods, Sample Size
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2