Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Ben Styles | 1 |
| Ben Weidmann | 1 |
| Cheung, Alan C. K. | 1 |
| Coldwell, Mike | 1 |
| Demack, Sean | 1 |
| Hugues Lortie-Forgues | 1 |
| Jake Anders | 1 |
| Lortie-Forgues, Hugues | 1 |
| Matthew Inglis | 1 |
| Maxwell, Bronwen | 1 |
| Reaney-Wood, Sarah | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sam Sims; Jake Anders; Matthew Inglis; Hugues Lortie-Forgues; Ben Styles; Ben Weidmann – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2023
Over the last twenty years, education researchers have increasingly conducted randomised experiments with the goal of informing the decisions of educators and policymakers. Such experiments have generally employed broad, consequential, standardised outcome measures in the hope that this would allow decisionmakers to compare effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Research Methodology, Randomized Controlled Trials, Program Effectiveness
Demack, Sean; Maxwell, Bronwen; Coldwell, Mike; Stevens, Anna; Wolstenholme, Claire; Reaney-Wood, Sarah; Stiell, Bernadette; Lortie-Forgues, Hugues – Education Endowment Foundation, 2021
This document summarises key findings from the quantitative strands of a review of the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) evaluations that had reported from the establishment of EEF in 2011 up to January 2019. The quantitative strands summarised include meta-analyses of effect sizes reported for attainment outcomes and descriptive analyses of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Disadvantaged Youth, Meta Analysis, Effect Size
Slavin, Robert E.; Cheung, Alan C. K. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2017
Large-scale randomized studies provide the best means of evaluating practical, replicable approaches to improving educational outcomes. This article discusses the advantages, problems, and pitfalls of these evaluations, focusing on alternative methods of randomization, recruitment, ensuring high-quality implementation, dealing with attrition, and…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evaluation Methods, Recruitment, Attrition (Research Studies)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
