Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Educational Testing | 2 |
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Psychological Testing | 2 |
| Content Validity | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Standards | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Test Items | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHogan, Thomas; DeStefano, Marissa; Gilby, Caitlin; Kosman, Dana; Peri, Joshua – Applied Measurement in Education, 2021
Buros' "Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY)" has provided professional reviews of commercially published psychological and educational tests for over 80 years. It serves as a kind of conscience for the testing industry. For a random sample of 50 entries in the "19th MMY" (a total of 100 separate reviews) this study determined…
Descriptors: Test Reviews, Interrater Reliability, Psychological Testing, Educational Testing
Download full textBeck, Klaus – Frontline Learning Research, 2020
Many test developers try to ensure the content validity of their tests by having external experts review the items, e.g. in terms of relevance, difficulty, or clarity. Although this approach is widely accepted, a closer look reveals several pitfalls need to be avoided if experts' advice is to be truly helpful. The purpose of this paper is to…
Descriptors: Content Validity, Psychological Testing, Educational Testing, Student Evaluation
