Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Educational Testing | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| Consumer Protection | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Curriculum | 1 |
| Educational Legislation | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Federal Regulation | 1 |
| Information Utilization | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Law and Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Debra P v Turlington | 1 |
| Larry P v Riles | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRobertson, Dario F. – Journal of Law and Education, 1980
This article will argue that cost-benefit analysis persuasively demonstrates that truth-in-testing laws are socially and economically justified but often fall short of providing a comprehensive regulatory scheme adequate to correct the market dislocations generated by an unregulated testing industry. (Author)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Consumer Protection, Cost Effectiveness, Court Litigation
Haney, Walt; Radin, Eugene – 1979
Remarks made at the conference are summarized in seven sections of this narrative report: (1) update: recent events concerning testing,--representing the viewpoints of school districts, professional associations, government agencies, and research organizations; (2) National Institute of Education (NIE) study of school districts' use of test and…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Court Litigation, Curriculum, Educational Legislation
