Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Educational Technology | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Scripts | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Courseware | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Examiners | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bell, John F. | 1 |
| Cai, Zhiqiang | 1 |
| Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
| Hopkin, Rebecca | 1 |
| Hu, Xiangen | 1 |
| Johnson, Martin | 1 |
| Shiell, Hannah | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cai, Zhiqiang; Hu, Xiangen; Graesser, Arthur C. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) are expensive to develop. While simple online courseware could be easily authored by teachers, the authoring of conversational ITSs usually involves a team of experts with different expertise, including domain experts, linguists, instruction designers, programmers, artists, computer scientists,…
Descriptors: Programming, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Courseware, Educational Technology
Johnson, Martin; Hopkin, Rebecca; Shiell, Hannah; Bell, John F. – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2012
In the UK and elsewhere, large-scale educational assessment agencies are shifting the mode of school examination marking towards having examiners mark examination scripts on screen rather than on paper. This shift has prompted questions about whether the mode of marking might influence examiner marking accuracy, particularly in relation to…
Descriptors: Correlation, Essays, Student Evaluation, Validity

Peer reviewed
Direct link
