NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nuseir, Mohammed T.; El Refae, Ghaleb A. – Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2022
This study empirically examines different factors that influence students to select universities in the UAE. The primary data were collected based on a survey of students at two public universities -- United Arab Emirates University and Zayed University, as well as three private universities -- New York University, Abu Dhabi University, and Alain…
Descriptors: Marketing, College Choice, Decision Making, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stewart, Amanda; Walk, Marlene; Kuenzi, Kerry – Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2021
Given increasingly crowded education marketplaces, an emerging perspective views education as a marketable product and seeks to explain what drives loyalty of alumni. Satisfaction has been used as an indicator of education quality and resides in a complex relationship of factors pertaining to students and institutions. The nonprofit graduate…
Descriptors: Alumni, Reputation, Educational Quality, Nonprofit Organizations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weerasinghe, I. M. S.; Fernando, R. L. S. – Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 2018
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explain critical factors affecting student satisfaction levels in selected state universities in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach: The study has applied an quantitative survey design guided by six hypotheses. A conceptual framework has been developed to address the research questions on the basis of a…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Satisfaction, Hypothesis Testing, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Idris, Muhammad Zaffwan; Whitfield, T. W. Allan – Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2014
Over the last decade, many universities attempted to improve their public image by changing their corporate visual identity (CVI) and/or name. Despite the prevalence of such practices, little research has been conducted into their effectiveness. The research reported here focused upon one facet of the higher education branding debate, that of the…
Descriptors: Universities, Higher Education, Marketing, Advertising
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Musa Pinar; Paul Trapp; Tulay Girard; Thomas E. Boyt – International Journal of Educational Management, 2014
Purpose: In today's complex and highly competitive marketplace, universities and colleges, realizing a need to develop sustainable strategies, have turned to branding as a solution. However, because of unique service characteristics, universities' branding attempts may not always result in success. The purpose of this paper, utilizing the concept…
Descriptors: Universities, Reputation, Institutional Characteristics, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kealy, Mary Jo; Rockel, Mark L. – Journal of Higher Education, 1987
The estimation of a comprehensive model describing student perceptions of college quality permits the determination of the relative importance of the influences that affect these perceptions. This knowledge is instrumental for directing efforts toward improving perceptions and for evaluating the effectiveness of changes in recruitment practices.…
Descriptors: College Choice, Colleges, Educational Quality, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Astin, Alexander W.; Solmon, Lewis C. – Change, 1981
A study on the objective correlates of undergraduate quality ratings, state or regional biases, and other methodological issues relating to reputational ratings of undergraduate quality is reported. The subjective judgments of departmental quality made by college and university faculty were studied. Reputational ratings appear to be redundant with…
Descriptors: Bias, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cardinal, Donald N.; Drew, David Eli – Journal of Special Education, 1993
A survey of 501 faculty members in doctorate-granting special education programs resulted in a ranking of the top 10 programs. Seventy-three percent of the variance in program reputation could be explained by four variables: faculty publication, time spent in research and writing, time spent in outside professional activity, and number of degrees…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Degrees (Academic), Disabilities, Doctoral Programs