Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Educational Improvement | 3 |
| Educational Quality | 3 |
| Program Validation | 3 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Quality Assurance | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| Citizenship Education | 1 |
| Civics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tandberg, David A.; Martin, Rebecca A. – State Higher Education Executive Officers, 2019
Higher education is facing a host of challenges, including external questions regarding its value and purpose. These questions cut to the core of the states' role in higher education. Traditionally, states have the responsibility to ensure that institutions of higher education are operating in the public interest and that the institutions are good…
Descriptors: Quality Assurance, Educational Quality, Educational Improvement, Higher Education
Creemers, Bert; Kyriakides, Leonidas – School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2015
This paper argues that the dynamic model of educational effectiveness can be used to establish stronger links between educational effectiveness research (EER) and school improvement. It provides research evidence to support the validity of the model. Thus, the importance of using the dynamic model to establish an evidence-based and theory-driven…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewedDry, Murray – PS: Political Science and Politics, 1996
Praises the efforts to develop a national standards for civics and government. However, discovers serious shortcomings in the current product. Claims that the current standards blur important distinctions and contain a number of factual errors. Recommends reducing the conceptual outlines and increasing illustrative cases and texts. (MJP)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Citizenship Education, Civics, Educational Assessment

Direct link
