Descriptor
Source
| Theory into Practice | 10 |
Author
| Brusic, Sharon A. | 1 |
| Fullick, Patrick | 1 |
| May, Wanda T. | 1 |
| Oberg, Antoinette | 1 |
| Porter, Julia Damron | 1 |
| Rosenauer, Walter | 1 |
| Russell, Earl B. | 1 |
| Stenhouse, Lawrence | 1 |
| Toepfer, Conrad F., Jr. | 1 |
| Walker, Decker F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedToepfer, Conrad F., Jr. – Theory into Practice, 1971
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Curriculum Development, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewedStenhouse, Lawrence – Theory into Practice, 1971
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Objectives, Humanities, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedWalker, Decker F. – Theory into Practice, 1982
Four characteristics of curriculum theory are proposed: (1) Curriculum theory focuses on content, aims, and program development in education; (2) Curriculum theory rationalizes procedures for curriculum construction; (3) Curriculum theory conceptualizes curricular phenomena; and (4) Curriculum theory attempts to explain curricular phenomena. (JN)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Research, Educational Change, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewedRussell, Earl B. – Theory into Practice, 1975
The author contends that curriculum improvement efforts in the field of vocational education should focus on teachers, especially on teachers who are favorably disposed toward change. (GW)
Descriptors: Change Agents, Curriculum Development, Educational Objectives, Inservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewedRosenauer, Walter – Theory into Practice, 1983
The relationships between educational theories and educational practices are discussed. Differences between a theory-to-practice approach and a goals-to-practice approach are explained. (PP)
Descriptors: Curriculum, Curriculum Development, Educational Objectives, Educational Philosophy
Peer reviewedPorter, Julia Damron – Theory into Practice, 1981
Most Appalachians are similar to mainstream America--White, Anglo-Saxon, and Protestant. However, the similarity has created an invisibility which has resulted in Appalachians being one of the most neglected of minority groups. Appalachians differ markedly from the mainstream in values and history. (JN)
Descriptors: Cultural Pluralism, Culture Lag, Curriculum Development, Economically Disadvantaged
Peer reviewedOberg, Antoinette – Theory into Practice, 1990
Journal writing in action research can be a tool for uncovering the facts of a situation (an empirical approach), or the expression of a professional life (a phenomenological approach). These two approaches are explored, and a radical redefinition of action research journal writing is presented. (IAH)
Descriptors: Action Research, Curriculum Development, Education Courses, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewedBrusic, Sharon A. – Theory into Practice, 1992
Discusses ways to achieve science-technology-society (STS) goals in education, focusing on various technology educators' perspectives on and approaches to STS (understanding the STS relationship, recognizing limitations and usefulness, appreciating intellectual stimuli, understanding applications and decisions, and gaining knowledge and…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Curriculum Development, Educational Change, Educational Innovation
Peer reviewedFullick, Patrick – Theory into Practice, 1992
Examines issues of science and technology education in the United Kingdom, focusing on the Science and Technology in Society (SATIS) project which was designed to produce resource units to enrich existing curriculum materials for secondary students. The article discusses criteria for materials development, evaluation of SATIS, and future…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Curriculum Development, Educational Change, Educational Innovation
Peer reviewedMay, Wanda T. – Theory into Practice, 1992
Discusses the actual subjects of study in science-technology-society (STS) education. The article looks at why it is being promoted, on what grounds, and by whom. It notes what alternative views compete with it, who will benefit, what constraints should be acknowledged, and what consequences can be anticipated. (SM)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Change, Educational Innovation, Educational Objectives


