Descriptor
| Educational Change | 4 |
| Interdisciplinary Approach | 4 |
| Time Blocks | 4 |
| Flexible Scheduling | 3 |
| Educational Strategies | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Intermediate Grades | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| School Effectiveness | 2 |
| Science Curriculum | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCooper, Sylvia L. – Science Teacher, 1996
Examines the benefits of flexible scheduling and the initial steps used in exploring this approach. Discusses the problem of loss of instructional time and the use of an independent research period as a solution. Presents results from an external assessment, ACT score data, and CTBS scores. (DDR)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Educational Change, Educational Strategies, Evaluation Methods
Lawton, Edward J. – Schools in the Middle, 1992
Two decades after helping a school begin the transition to middle level, observations are made of the results of middle school planning, implementation, and evaluation. Chief areas of focus were interdisciplinary teaming, block scheduling, exploratory activities, and an adviser-advisee arrangement. (MLF)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Guidance Programs, Interdisciplinary Approach, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewedDay, Martha M.; And Others – Science Teacher, 1996
Discusses the training and preparation for the transition to block scheduling. Provides a summary of some of the aspects of the four-by-four block schedule and describes strategies employed to modify instruction and curriculum. Includes two sample interdisciplinary activities. (DDR)
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Educational Change, Educational Strategies, Flexible Scheduling
Peer reviewedVan Zandt, Laura M.; Totten, Samuel – Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 1995
Suggests that much of the research on middle level education is weak, sparse, and inconclusive. Presents critiques of research and an overview of the research findings of several highly-rated middle level programs. Identifies four factors contributing to the problem, specifically: an insufficient number of studies, utilization of weak research…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Analysis, Cooperative Learning, Educational Change


