Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Educational Change | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| School Community Programs | 3 |
| Interviews | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| School Community Relationship | 2 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Administrator Attitudes | 1 |
| Aesthetics | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Maine | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rheingold, Alison; Seaman, Jayson – Dialogic Pedagogy, 2017
In this paper we discuss how the products of student work during long-term, interdisciplinary curricular units at King Middle School, a grades 6-8 public school in Portland, Maine, through their aesthetic qualities, transformed people's understanding of what children were capable of. We argue that, to effectively understand student work of this…
Descriptors: Relevance (Education), Middle School Students, Grade 6, Grade 7
Jung, Jessica – Education & Training, 2011
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to chart developments in a community engagement scheme run by two Universities in the North East, offering students academic credit in return for work within the local community. The particular focus is on how learning has been assessed from this work experience, within the requirements of higher education…
Descriptors: Work Experience, Service Learning, College Credits, Educational Practices
PDF pending restorationCampbell, Patricia B. – 1992
This brochure, one in a series of four, is designed to assist program directors, teachers, and evaluators evaluate programs to encourage girls in mathematics, science, and engineering. Seven sections cover the why, the what, and some of the how of program evaluation. The first section explains why programs need to be evaluated. The second section…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Engineering Education, Enrollment

Peer reviewed
Direct link
