Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 4 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 19 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 53 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 102 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 21 |
| Practitioners | 18 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 5 |
| Taiwan | 3 |
| United Kingdom | 3 |
| Belgium | 2 |
| Canada | 2 |
| Georgia | 2 |
| Alabama | 1 |
| Australia | 1 |
| Bahrain | 1 |
| Botswana | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 2 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 2 |
| International English… | 1 |
| United States Medical… | 1 |
| Writing Apprehension Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Von Diether, Barbara – Training, 1992
Improvement of writing in the workplace involves both writers and their managers in a systematic process: (1) prepackaging the assignment; (2) delegating; (3) clarifying and focusing the assignment; (4) promoting efficient writing techniques; (5) efficient editing and/or peer reviewing; and (6) reviewing the final document. (SK)
Descriptors: Editing, Management Development, Revision (Written Composition), Supervisors
Peer reviewedGerich, Carol – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Describes revision as practiced at a major scientific research and development laboratory. Shows how scientific authors, technical editors, colleague reviewers, and supervisors team up in a collaborative approach in which editors provide substantive revisions early in the collaborative review process. Argues that editors should become involved at…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Editing, Editors, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedSpeck, Bruce W. – Technical Communication, 1991
Assesses three conflicting views: that the author is the final authority; that the author is incompetent; and that the editor has final authority. Reveals editors' four rhetorical strategies to establish authority: using editorial dialogue, defining the audience, citing authority, and teaching. Classifies editors as having high or low status. (SR)
Descriptors: Authors, Editing, Editors, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedHarp, Bill – Reading Teacher, 1988
Outlines the process of peer editing, and points out that research shows peer editing to be highly effective. (ARH)
Descriptors: Editing, Peer Teaching, Revision (Written Composition), Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedO'Donnell, Holly – Journal of Reading, 1987
Explores the advantages and disadvantages of microcomputer text editors and spelling checkers and implications for their classroom use. (SRT)
Descriptors: Automation, Editing, Grammar, Language Usage
Peer reviewedMiles, Thomas H. – Technical Communication, 1990
Gives a case history of how one writing group devised a way to deal with the problem of author-created noun strings and long, indecipherable unit modifiers, satisfying both internal and external clients. Describes the development of an in-house usage guide. (PRA)
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Language Usage, Readability
Peer reviewedFletcher, Ralph – New Advocate, 1996
Discusses a particular reader's struggle with the need to revise his work at the request of an editor and relates it to the challenges that his students face. Lists three conditions that are necessary for him to make revisions: the presence of an outside skilled writer; someone who genuinely respects his work; and give and take. (TB)
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition)
Schwartz, Alix – 1990
A teacher describes what happens when professional writers are invited into his college composition classroom to talk about and show the processes they employ in revising their work, and reports that students benefit not only by hearing about but also by actually seeing successive drafts. In the class, the students begin the semester by analyzing…
Descriptors: Authors, Classroom Communication, Editing, Higher Education
Peer reviewedTimmons, Theresa Cullen – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1987
Indicates that using highlighters to mark errors produced a 76% class improvement in removing comma errors and a 95.5% improvement in removing apostrophe errors. Outlines two teaching procedures, to be followed before introducing this tool to the class, that enable students to remove errors at this effective rate. (JD)
Descriptors: Editing, Instructional Materials, Punctuation, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedBarnard, David; And Others – Computers and the Humanities, 1988
Identifies the Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) as the best basis for a markup standard for encoding literary texts. Outlines solutions to problems using SGML and discusses the problem of maintaining multiple views of a document. Examines several ways of reducing the burden of markups. (GEA)
Descriptors: Computers, Editing, Electronic Publishing, Literature
Ojala, Marydee – Searcher, 1996
Examines the practice and implications of issuing corrections, retractions, and amplifications in online databases. All database producers do not provide mechanisms to accommodate retractions and corrections, and it can be difficult for a searcher to find evidence of error correction. Sidebars illustrate both the lack of and evidence of…
Descriptors: Database Producers, Databases, Editing, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewedReed, Candi Mascia – Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 1995
These guidelines for teaching editing skills to secondary students with hearing impairments focus on: (1) revision, in which students review and refine the content, ideas, and form of their writing; and (2) proofreading and copy editing, in which students examine grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling. Ways to utilize peers as…
Descriptors: Editing, English, Hearing Impairments, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedBush, Don – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Discusses ways an editor can cut out words to help the reader understand quickly. Discusses dead wood, redundancy, redundancy in thought, smothered verbs, false precision, editing and academia, and making copy smoother. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Language Usage, Redundancy, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedHaugen, Diane – Research in the Teaching of English, 1990
Examines differences between composition researchers and communication professionals in use of the term "editing." Argues for cooperation between these two groups to develop an interdisciplinary definition of editing to bring consistency to research, precision to the editing process, and substantial advance in the bridge between theory…
Descriptors: Definitions, Editing, Editors, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewedCook, Devan – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 2001
Shows how an editing assignment emphasizing punctuation can help students in a first-year writing class discover new ideas and perspectives as part of the revision process. Considers a class that experimented with editing punctuation for a dual purpose--as a revision heuristic as well as for correctness. Reconsiders editing and revision…
Descriptors: Class Activities, Editing, Freshman Composition, Higher Education


