Descriptor
| Editing | 4 |
| Professional Development | 4 |
| Technical Writing | 4 |
| Computers | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Writing for Publication | 2 |
| Authors | 1 |
| Cooperation | 1 |
| Corporations | 1 |
| Education | 1 |
| Employee Attitudes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Historical Materials | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHarris, John S. – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1996
Offers personal reflections of a professor's long career in technical writing. Looks primarily at technical writing in the university, where most technical writers are now trained and where most theory originates. Recognizes that many improvements in the field have happened because the use of computers makes revision and production of copy easier.…
Descriptors: Computers, Editing, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness
Faas, Larry A. – 1984
A study compared the publication rates of solicited and unsolicited articles in refereed and nonrefereed journals. Editors from 98 psychology and education journals supplied information regarding the number of solicited and unsolicited articles they received each year, length of time between acceptance and publication, and designation of the…
Descriptors: Editing, Education, Professional Development, Psychology
Peer reviewedCarliner, Saul – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1996
Looks at 10 hypothetical scenarios as a means of examining how technical communicators contribute to perceptions that they are less than strategic or central to the operations of companies. Discusses certification, conference attendance, professional development, client relations, and editing. (TB)
Descriptors: Computers, Corporations, Editing, Employee Attitudes
Sims, R. L. – 1983
The key to producing professional quality documents is the dialogue between writers and editors. Such a dialogue should include six major components: genuineness, accurate empathetic understanding, unconditional positive regard, presentness, a spirit of mutual equality, and a supportive psychological climate. Such an atmosphere was created at one…
Descriptors: Authors, Cooperation, Editing, Interpersonal Communication


