NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 24 results Save | Export
Russo, Charles J. – School Business Affairs, 2009
Maintaining a safe, orderly learning environment is a significant challenge for education leaders, especially when students insist on bringing alcohol, weapons, and drugs into schools. To compound that challenge, educators who wish to uncover contraband must do so within the confines of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable…
Descriptors: Educational Environment, School Safety, Student Rights, Privacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davis, Bebi – Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2007
Because of a proposed policy, public school teachers in Hawaii are facing the possibility of being randomly tested for illegal drugs. Random drug testing has many implications and its impact is questionable. In this article, the author scrutinizes the controversial drug-testing policy for both troubling and promising aspects and how educators may…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Public Schools, Public School Teachers, Privacy
Palestini, Robert; Falk, Karen Palestini – Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2012
This third edition expands coverage on such topics as the law and students with disabilities, confidentiality, sexual harassment, student searches and tuition vouchers. It also includes some new topics such as bullying, copyright law, and the law and the internet. Both public and nonpublic school educators are aware that courts, over the last…
Descriptors: School Law, Court Litigation, Public Schools, Private Schools
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 2000
In its "stare decisis" ruling upholding a Pennsylvania school district's random drug-testing policy, a three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals nonetheless declared its disagreement with a similar panel's 1998 decision upholding another district's policy of random, suspicionless drug, alcohol, and tobacco testing. (MLH)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Privacy
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1999
By upholding a student's refusal to provide a urine sample, the Seventh Circuit Court correctly avoided further erosion of the Fourth Amendment's privacy principle. In "New Jersey v T.L.O." (1995), the U.S. Supreme Court shrunk the probable-cause standard to reasonable suspicion in the special context of public schools, retaining the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, High Schools, Privacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Journal of Law and Education, 1996
The Supreme Court, in "Vernonia School District 47J versus Acton," ruled that a school district's policy authorizing random urinalysis drug testing of student-athletes did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Discusses the decision and why such a policy is permissible under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Extramural Athletics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Orr, Ginger – Journal of Law and Education, 2000
Discusses the importance of drug-testing policies for educators by analyzing the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal's decision in "Knox v. Knox." Concludes that mandatory drug testing for educators in safety-sensitive positions will not infringe on the constitutional rights of school employees. (Contains 30 footnotes.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gibbs, Annette – West's Education Law Reporter, 1991
Mandatory testing of college and university athletes has met with mixed success not only in combating substance abuse but in legal arguments. Students have claimed that drug testing violates their constitutional rights of equal protection, protection against unreasonable search and seizure, and due process, and is a gross invasion of privacy.…
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Education
Pittman, Andrew T.; Slough, Mark R. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1996
Addresses the Fourth Amendment constitutional challenges facing high school student-athlete drug testing programs and applies the findings in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the "Vernonia versus Acton" case, the first drug-testing case involving high school student athletes to be decided by the Court, by recommending 12 safeguards…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Federal Courts
Walker, Karen – Education Partnerships, Inc., 2005
The Vernonia School District v. Acton Supreme Court decision in 1995, forever changed the landscape of the legality of drug testing in schools. This decision stated that students who were involved in athletic programs could be drug tested as long as the student's privacy was not invaded. According to some in the medical profession, there are two…
Descriptors: Addictive Behavior, Substance Abuse, Extracurricular Activities, Athletics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stefkovich, Jacqueline A. – Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 1996
In recent years, public school students have been searched with metal detectors and occasionally sniffed by dogs or strip searched. Their lockers and bookbags have been searched, and their urine has been tested for drugs--all in the name of school safety. This article explores the legal ramifications of such searches and calls for a critical…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems
Russo, Charles J.; Morse, Timothy E. – School Business Affairs, 1995
In "Acton," the Supreme Court upheld a local school board policy calling for the random, suspicionless drug testing of interscholastic student-athletes. Reviews the Court's holdings. Concludes that a drug-testing policy that is consistent with "Acton" and enjoys broad-based community support probably would be worth its expense.…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Abuse, Drug Use Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stader, David L. – Clearing House, 2002
Notes that students' legitimate expectations of privacy and school officials' need to maintain school discipline and safety often collide. Outlines guidelines for searching in the following instances: student lockers; drug dogs; student trips; strip searches; and urinalysis. Suggests that training for all administrators, faculty, and staff in the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Drug Use Testing, Management Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mahon, J. Patrick – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
In June 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Vernonia (Oregon) School District's right to conduct random drug tests of its student athletes. The court balanced a seventh grader's privacy interest with the state's interest in curbing drug abuse among student athletes. Before adopting drug-testing policies, school boards should assess the local…
Descriptors: Athletes, Boards of Education, Community Involvement, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teagarden, C. Claude – West's Education Law Reporter, 1991
Examines the National Collegiate Athletic Association's drug testing program of student-athletes and relevant legal decisions. Concludes that each individual urinalysis search, not based on suspicion, is a violation of the student-athlete's privacy and is an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (100 references) (MLF)
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2