NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)0
Since 2007 (last 20 years)3
Education Level
Higher Education1
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 45 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ploog, Bertram O.; Kim, Nina – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2007
Autistic and typical children mastered a simultaneous discrimination task with three sets of all-tactile compound stimuli. During training, responding to one stimulus (S+) resulted in rewards whereas responding to the alternative (S-) was extinguished. Test 1 was conducted with recombinations of S+ and S- elements. In Test 2, the test stimulus to…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Rewards, Autism, Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mok, Leh Woon; Overmier, J. Bruce – Psychological Record, 2007
The differential outcomes effect is a phenomenon where use of a choice-unique outcome for each type of correct choice in a conditional discrimination task increases rate of learning and overall accuracy, as compared to the traditional use of a single, common outcome for all types of correct choices. This phenomenon was successfully demonstrated…
Descriptors: Rewards, Outcomes of Treatment, College Students, Sensory Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walls, Richard T.; Rude, Stanley H. – Child Study Journal, 1975
This study assessed the effect of different novelty pairings and reward sequences on the exploratory behavior in successive discrimination learning problems of 60 preschool children from a Head Start program. (BRT)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Educationally Disadvantaged, Preschool Education, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dickerson, Donald J. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1970
Three groups of severely retarded and three groups of mildly retarded individuals responded to a series of five 10-trial oddity problems under nonreward conditions. Results suggest that oddity is a stimulus characteristic to which an approach response is made, independent of its concurrent association with reward, and that stimulus value of oddity…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Institutionalized Persons, Mental Retardation, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCullers, John C.; Martin, Judith A. Gardner – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Feedback, Grade 4, Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Witte, Kenneth L.; Grossman, Eugene E. – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Attention, Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children, Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berman, Phyllis W. – Child Development, 1973
If learning is viewed in terms of the tendency to approach a stimulus that has been rewarded and to avoid a stimulus that has not been rewarded, then it must be concluded that the subjects in this study did not learn. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discrimination Learning, Preschool Children, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rothberg, Carole; Harris, Mary B. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1972
In general, the study confirmed the prediction that learning of a discrimination under punishment or a reward-punishment condition is superior to that under reward alone. (Authors)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Grade 1, Negative Reinforcement, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Capaldi, E.J.; Haas, A.; Miller, R.M.; Martins, A. – Learning and Motivation, 2005
In both discrimination learning and partial reinforcement, transitions may occur from nonrewarded to rewarded trials (NR transition). In discrimination learning, NR transitions may occur in two different stimulus alternatives (NR different transitions). In partial reward, NR transitions may occur in a single stimulus alternative (NR same…
Descriptors: Rewards, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Classical Conditioning
Williams, Deborah Anne; Cameron, Catherine Ann – 1980
The effect of stimulus novelty, an attentional variable, on learning set acquisition was investigated. Learning set (LS) acquisition refers to an improvement in performance across a series of problems which have a common basis of solution. The design of this study involved two groups, one in which the positive stimulus on Trial 2 involved the…
Descriptors: Attention, Discrimination Learning, Learning Processes, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Favell, Judith Elbert; And Others – 1968
In this study of errorless learning a procedure is tested which allows the subject himself to adjust the speed at which a supplementary stimulus aid is withdrawn. A standard match-to-sample apparatus with 1 sample window above and 4 matching (response) windows below was used. Tokens were delivered for correct responses and the correct matching…
Descriptors: Cues, Disadvantaged, Discrimination Learning, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Masters, John C.; And Others – Child Development, 1977
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Mastery Learning, Preschool Education, Rewards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haaf, Robert A. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Cues, Discrimination Learning, Grade 2, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGraw, Kenneth O.; McCullers, John C. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
To determine whether the distraction effect associated with material rewards in discrimination learning can account for the superior performance of reward groups in probability learning, the performance of 144 school children (preschool, second, and fifth grades) on a two-choice successive discrimination task was compared under three reinforcement…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berman, Phyllis W. – Developmental Psychology, 1973
The age effect in this study was such that younger children required proportionately more experience with reward than nonreward before they were able to improve their performance on reward problems over six sessions. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3