NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Education Level
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 120 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gold, Marc W.; Barclay, Craig R. – Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2015
A procedure to effectively and efficiently train moderately and severely retarded individuals to make fine visual discriminations is described. Results suggest that expectancies for such individuals are in need of examination. Implications for sheltered workshops, work activity centers and classrooms are discussed. [This article appeared…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Exceptional Child Research, Moderate Intellectual Disability, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goranson, R. E.; Theodor, L. H. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Memory, Perception, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bufford, Rodger K. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1971
Reports three experiments conducted to investigate factors controlling performance of nonreinforced verbal imitation. (WY)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Graphs, Imitation, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Riordan, Michelle – Cognition, 2000
Compared the performance of children with and without autism in object-based positive and negative priming tasks within a visual search procedure. Found object-based positive and negative priming effects in both groups, with no group differences in the magnitude of the effects. Compared to typically developing children, children with autism were…
Descriptors: Autism, Children, Comparative Analysis, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wilson, Marian Monyok – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
The stimulus-familiarization-effect (SFE) paradigm, a reaction-time (RT) task based on a response to novelty procedure, was modified to assess response for novelty, ie., a response-reinforcement sequence. The potential implications of attention for reinforcement theory and learning in general are discussed. (Author/CS)
Descriptors: Attention, Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lester, Gene – Journal of General Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, College Students, Discrimination Learning, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haaf, Robert A. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Cues, Discrimination Learning, Grade 2, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGraw, Kenneth O.; McCullers, John C. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
To determine whether the distraction effect associated with material rewards in discrimination learning can account for the superior performance of reward groups in probability learning, the performance of 144 school children (preschool, second, and fifth grades) on a two-choice successive discrimination task was compared under three reinforcement…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Motivation
Bourne, L. E., Jr.; Miller, Shirley – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
Purpose of this experiment was to explore the effects of pre- and postshift stimulus similarity, type of shift, and difficulty of discrimination in the standard solution shift - concept identification paradigm. (Authors/CB)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Performance Factors, Shift Studies
Dickerson, Donald J.; And Others – Develop Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Deckner, C. William; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1982
Procedures were used to assess capacity to sustain adaptive responding and discrimination learning ability in 18 psychotic nonverbal children. It was concluded that the measures had good face validity with respect to assessment of discrimination, learning ability, and tolerance for intermittent reinforcement. (SB)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Emotional Disturbances, Performance Factors, Psychosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Xu, Fei – Cognition, 2003
Two experiments compared 6-month-olds' numerosity discrimination performance on both large numbers and small numbers with both total filled area and total contour length controlled. Results showed that infants succeeded in discriminating 4 from 8 elements, but failed to discriminate 2 from 4 elements, providing evidence for the existence of two…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Infant Behavior, Infants
Keeley, Stuart M.; Sprague, Robert L. – J Exp Child Psychol, 1969
Research supported in part by Public Health Service grant NB-07346 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Feedback, Handicapped Children, Learning Motivation
HALL, VERNON C.; AND OTHERS – 1967
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF FIVE VARIABLES (INITIAL INSTRUCTIONS, REWARD, LETTER SIZE, TYPE OF WARM-UP, AND FEEDBACK) ON KINDERGARTEN CHILDREN'S PERFORMANCE OF A LETTER DISCRIMINATION TASK. IT HAS BEEN ARGUED THAT ATTENTION IS THE KEY FACTOR IN LETTER DISCRIMINATION. THE PRESENT STUDY PROPOSES THAT A…
Descriptors: Attention, Discrimination Learning, Kindergarten Children, Perception
Spence, Janet Taylor – Child Develop, 1970
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Failure, Grade 2, Grade 3
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8