NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers5
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Intelligence Scale…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 49 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ray, Deepshikha – International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2023
This study purports to bridge the gap in research directed at people with Low Functioning Autism (LFA) by exploring if sensory discrimination ability can be used to assess cognitive functioning in children with LFA. The study was done in two phases: (i) a pilot phase (with 4 male participants; mean age = 3 years 6.5 months)--which tried to…
Descriptors: Sensory Experience, Discrimination Learning, Children, Autism Spectrum Disorders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Halbur, Mary; Kodak, Tiffany; Williams, Xi'an; Reidy, Jessi; Halbur, Christopher – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2021
A portion of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have difficulty acquiring conditional discrimination. However, previous researchers suggested that the discrimination of nonverbal auditory stimuli may be acquired more efficiently (Eikeseth & Hayward, 2009; Uwer, et al., 2002). For example, a child may learn to touch a…
Descriptors: Children, Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rose, Jane; Flaherty, Mary; Browning, Jenna; Leibold, Lori J.; Buss, Emily – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2018
Purpose: Published data indicate nearly adultlike frequency discrimination in infants but large child -adult differences for school-age children. This study evaluated the role that differences in measurement procedures and stimuli may have played in the apparent nonmonotonicity. Frequency discrimination was assessed in preschoolers, young…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Young Children, Adults, Auditory Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marshall, Nigel; Shibazaki, Kagari – Music Education Research, 2011
In this paper, we report on two studies carried out to further explore the level of listening and discriminatory abilities present in very young children through the development of an age appropriate methodology. Working with children aged between 3 and 4 years of age, our first study explored the level of performance achieved on a matching task…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Young Children, Preschool Children, Listening Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brosch, Michael; Selezneva, Elena; Bucks, Cornelia; Scheich, Henning – Cognition, 2004
This study demonstrates that non-human primates can categorize the direction of the pitch change of tones in a sequence. Two "Macaca fascicularis" were trained in a positive-reinforcement behavioral paradigm in which they listened to sequences of a variable number of different acoustic items. The training of discriminating pitch direction was…
Descriptors: Acoustics, Primatology, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wormith, S. J.; And Others – Child Development, 1975
Investigated the possibility that evidence of frequency discrimination might be found when the experimental procedures involved the conjugate reinforcement of nonnutritive sucking. (SDH)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Cognitive Development, Discrimination Learning, Infant Behavior
Olsho, Lynne Werner; And Others – 1979
Frequency difference thresholds were determined for fourteen 4- to 9-month-old infants (mean age, 6 months 10 days) using a discrimination learning paradigm, following a one-up, two-down staircase procedure. The subject heard 500 msec tone bursts repeated at a rate of one per sec, with a fixed standard frequency. At various points in this pulse…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Discrimination Learning, Infant Behavior
Jeffares, Dolores J.; Cosens, Grace V. – Albert J Educ Res, 1970
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Discrimination Learning, Grade 1, Reading Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuller, Peter W.; And Others – Child Development, 1981
Determines whether an averaged evoked potential technique using a random-v-repetitive presentation mode could be used to study infant auditory discrimination. Results showed a main effect of presentation mode with shorter latency for random v repetitive. The shortest onset latency was for random stimulus at the fast rate. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Attention Span, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davis, Sylvia M.; McCroskey, Robert L. – Child Development, 1980
Focuses on auditory fusion (defined in terms of a listerner's ability to distinguish paired acoustic events from single acoustic events) in 3- to 12-year-old children. The subjects listened to 270 pairs of tones controlled for frequency, intensity, and duration. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trehub, Sandra E.; And Others – Child Development, 1984
Two experiments involving a total of 177 infants 8 to 11 months of age found that subjects used a global processing strategy like adults' in discriminating transformations of a six-tone melody. Subjects needed melodic contour and frequency range to judge new sequences, but, in easy tasks, they also used absolute frequency. (CB)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Discrimination Learning, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ainsworth, W. A.; Millar, J. B. – Language and Speech, 1971
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Cues, Discrimination Learning
Ling, Daniel; Doehring, Donald G. – J Speech Hearing Res, 1969
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Training, Deafness, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cherry, Rochelle Silberzweig – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981
Fifty-three children (ages 5-9) were individually tested on their ability to select pictures of monosyllabic words presented diotically via headphones. Tasks were presented in quiet and under three noise (distractor) conditions: white noise, speech backwards, and speech forward. Age and type of distractor significantly influenced test scores.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bishop, D. V. M.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1990
Comparison of 48 cerebral palsied individuals (aged 10-18), either with impaired speech or normal speech, found speech-impaired subjects were able to discriminate phoneme contrasts adequately in a word judgment task but performed less well on a phoneme discrimination "same-different" task possibly resulting from a weak memory for novel…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Auditory Discrimination, Cerebral Palsy, Comprehension
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4