Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Discourse Analysis | 6 |
| Phrase Structure | 6 |
| English | 3 |
| Grammar | 3 |
| Semantics | 3 |
| Structural Analysis… | 3 |
| Contrastive Linguistics | 2 |
| Nouns | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Verbs | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Sciences | 6 |
Author
| Chenoweth, N. Ann | 1 |
| Connolly, John H. | 1 |
| Francis, Elaine J. | 1 |
| Hengeveld, Kees | 1 |
| Maynard, Senko K. | 1 |
| Miller, Jim | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Connolly, John H. – Language Sciences, 2012
An essential task for the morphosyntactic level within the grammatical component of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) is the handling of constituent ordering. This area of grammar, which is known as positional syntax, constitutes the subject of the present paper, in which the ordering of constituents is examined within the framework of a dynamic…
Descriptors: Syntax, Grammar, Structural Analysis (Linguistics), Linguistic Theory
Hengeveld, Kees – Language Sciences, 2012
It follows from the ordering principles that are applied in Functional Discourse Grammar that the positional possibilities of markers of agreement and those of cross-reference are different. Markers of cross reference are predicted to occur closer to the verb stem, while markers of agreement would occupy peripheral positions. This paper tests…
Descriptors: Nouns, Prediction, Grammar, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewedFrancis, Elaine J. – Language Sciences, 1998
Shows that looking at individual semantic functions of grammatical morphemes is essential to explaining particular cases of noniconicity between lexical categories and their discourse functions. It is suggested that, in light of this importance of the functions of individual grammatical morphemes, it is now easier to evaluate why…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, English, Grammar, Morphemes
Peer reviewedChenoweth, N. Ann – Language Sciences, 1995
Examines the in-class essay as written by university freshmen to assess the extent to which students use formulaic expressions to minimize the cognitive burden of generating a coherent and adequate answer. Results show that students made extensive use of formulaic expressions and shaped their answers to reflect the way the information had been…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Discourse Analysis, Discourse Modes
Peer reviewedMaynard, Senko K. – Language Sciences, 1996
Examines, within the framework of contrastive rhetoric, nominal clauses and predicates, arguing that there are essential differences in nominalization between English and Japanese, such as focusing on the event in Japanese and on the individual in English. The article emphasizes the diverse ways in which languages are endowed to express different…
Descriptors: Cohesion (Written Composition), Contrastive Linguistics, Cultural Context, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewedMiller, Jim – Language Sciences, 1996
Discusses the ways languages of Europe render the "given"-"new" distinction on the basis of data collected by means of presenting speakers of various languages with the task of reconstructing a route on a map. The article raises questions about the nature of "wh"-pronouns in English and about what is shared by these…
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Dialogs (Language), Discourse Analysis, English

Direct link
