Descriptor
| Disability Discrimination | 2 |
| Educational Testing | 2 |
| Test Reviews | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Access to Information | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Cultural Differences | 1 |
| Culture Fair Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Clarizio, Harvey F. | 1 |
| Rouk, Ullik | 1 |
Publication Type
| Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| System of Multicultural… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedClarizio, Harvey F. – School Psychology Digest, 1979
The administration of intelligence tests to various sociocultural groups is defended against charges that intelligence tests are discriminatory (TM 504 174). The author states that research has shown that intelligence tests are nondiscriminatory and comply with federal law, specifically Public Law 94-142. (MH)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Culture Fair Tests, Disability Discrimination, Educational Discrimination
Download full textRouk, Ullik – Insights on Education iPolicy, Practice, and Research, 2000
State leaders are using complex accountability systems, composed of standards, assessments, public reporting, rewards, and sanctions, to raise student, school, and district achievement. The public strongly supports making academic standards more challenging, despite a lack of consensus on content and outcomes. Some states may revise standards…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Access to Information, Accountability
