Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Disabilities | 3 |
| Legal Problems | 3 |
| Legal Responsibility | 3 |
| Educational Legislation | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Access to Education | 1 |
| Advocacy | 1 |
| Behavior Disorders | 1 |
| Behavior Standards | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Japan | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkCollins, Lauren W.; Zirkel, Perry A. – Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2017
Functional behavior assessments (FBAs) and behavior intervention plans (BIPs) are critical components in the education of students with, or at risk for, emotional disturbance (ED). The purpose of this article is to compare the legal requirements with the professional requirements for FBAs and BIPs. The comparison is first according to the…
Descriptors: Functional Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, Positive Behavior Supports, Legal Responsibility
Download full textNagano, Mayumi; Weinberg, Lois A. – International Journal of Special Education, 2012
Japan faces an educational challenge even after the start of a new special education system (Tokubetsushienkyouiku). This article addresses the legal framework of the special education system in Japan and analyzes the issues needed to be addressed to reinforce the inclusion of children with disabilities in public regular school settings. The…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Inclusion, Special Education, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedHill, Wayne A., Jr. – Journal of College and University Law, 1992
The history, provisions, and impact on universities of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) are examined. It is concluded that the ADA will not break new ground for higher education and that Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 will remain the main avenue by which disabled obtain access to universities. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Comparative Analysis, Disabilities, Federal Legislation
