Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Disabilities | 4 |
| Individualized Education… | 4 |
| Grade 11 | 3 |
| Special Education | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Grade 12 | 2 |
| High School Students | 2 |
| Outcomes of Education | 2 |
| Self Determination | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 11 | 4 |
| Grade 10 | 3 |
| High Schools | 3 |
| Secondary Education | 3 |
| Grade 12 | 2 |
| Grade 9 | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| Alabama | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
| Kansas | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| North Dakota | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
| Washington | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Flowers, Claudia; Test, David W.; Povenmire-Kirk, Tiana C.; Diegelmann, Karen M.; Bunch-Crump, Kimberly R.; Kemp-Inman, Amy; Goodnight, Crystalyn I. – Journal of Special Education, 2018
Communicating Interagency Relationships and Collaborative Linkages for Exceptional Students (CIRCLES) is a transition-planning service delivery model designed to guide schools in implementing interagency collaboration. This study examined the impact of CIRCLES on students' self-determination and participation in individualized education program…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Delivery Systems, Individualized Transition Plans, Agency Cooperation
Rabren, Karen; Johnson, Cinda – Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 2010
There is a growing emphasis on academic performance and educational outcomes for students with disabilities. This focus is demonstrated, in part, by the federal requirement to collect post-school outcome data from these former students (i.e., Indicator 14). The purpose of this paper is to introduce two states' approaches to collecting post-school…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Data Collection, Academic Achievement, Disabilities
Kaczkowski, Melissa – ProQuest LLC, 2013
The purpose of this single community qualitative case study was to determine how the voice of the student was present in the IEP process, documentation paperwork, and curricular and diagnostic decisions, among a group of seven students, grades 9 through 12, placed in a self-contained program for students with emotional disabilities in a suburban…
Descriptors: Special Education, Qualitative Research, Case Studies, Student Attitudes
Albus, Deb; Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Thurlow, Martha L.; Cormier, Damien – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2009
In April 2007, Federal No Child Left Behind regulations were finalized that provided states with additional flexibility for assessing some students with disabilities. The regulations allowed states to offer another assessment option, alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MAS). States are not required to have…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Objectives, Outcomes of Education, Academic Achievement

Peer reviewed
Direct link
