NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gusinow, Joan F.; Price, Louis E. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Correlation, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference, Reinforcement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Freeman, N. H.; Parker, D. M. – British Journal of Psychology, 1973
Results clearly show a preference for correctly classified familiar shapes over their novel counterparts. (Authors)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Classification, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schonemann, Peter H.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
Descriptors: Algorithms, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference, Individual Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Ann L.; Campione, Joseph C. – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Color, Cues, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benjafield, John – American Journal of Psychology, 1976
Tests the hypothesis that when a "control for size" is introduced, preference for rectangles near the golden section reemerges. Also focuses on the "measure of preference". (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Charts, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference, Mathematical Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jones-Molfese, Victoria J. – Child Development, 1972
This investigation also studied the relationship between gestational age and preferences for contour. (CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference, Eye Fixations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Richardson, Jack; Stanton, Sara K. – American Journal of Psychology, 1972
Results are consistent with the assumption that subjects do not change functional stimuli because of the negative transfer produced by learning different responses to the same nominal stimuli. (Authors/CB)
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Cues, Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Patricia H. – Child Development, 1973
Results show that both kindergarten nonconservers and kindergarten conservers found height most salient. Third-grade conservers found quantity most salient but could easily attend to height and width. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Conservation (Concept), Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Block, Karen K.; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1973
Results showed that reversal shift was easier than extradimensional shift and that relative shift difficulty was unaffected by instructions, in contrast to findings with college-age subjects. (Authors)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Concept Formation, Data Analysis, Developmental Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tighe, Thomas J.; Tighe, Louise S. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Presolution reversal prevented or significantly retarded learning in kindergarten and first-grade children but did not hinder learning in fifth-grade children. (Authors)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Concept Formation, Cues, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brier, Norman; Jacobs, Paul I. – Child Development, 1972
A single administration of the reversal learning paradigm is not a sufficient basis for determining either a given subject's choice of option or his behavior on its constituent learning measures. This conclusion raises many questions about past research relating to mediation theory, since this paradigm has been the basic one employed. (Authors)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Dimensional Preference, Discrimination Learning, Grade 2
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bartol, Curt; Pielstick, N. L. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
It was concluded that previous explanations of visual exploration or stimulus preference have been oversimplified, and studies on the whole have failed to take into account a crucial interaction between sex and age variables. (Authors)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Ambiguity, Behavioral Science Research, Data Analysis