Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Ability | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 2 |
| Test Length | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| He, Wei | 1 |
| Reckase, Mark D. | 1 |
| Seong, Tae-Je | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
He, Wei; Reckase, Mark D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
For computerized adaptive tests (CATs) to work well, they must have an item pool with sufficient numbers of good quality items. Many researchers have pointed out that, in developing item pools for CATs, not only is the item pool size important but also the distribution of item parameters and practical considerations such as content distribution…
Descriptors: Item Banks, Test Length, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing
Seong, Tae-Je; And Others – 1997
This study was designed to compare the accuracy of three commonly used ability estimation procedures under the graded response model. The three methods, maximum likelihood (ML), expected a posteriori (EAP), and maximum a posteriori (MAP), were compared using a recovery study design for two sample sizes, two underlying ability distributions, and…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Estimation (Mathematics)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
