Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 3 |
| Difficulty Level | 3 |
| Test Length | 3 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Duplication | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Majors (Students) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Alessio, Helaine M. | 1 |
| Bailer, A. John | 1 |
| Lang, Joseph B. | 1 |
| Malay, Nancy | 1 |
| Maurer, Karsten | 1 |
| Rubin, Beth | 1 |
| Sunbul, Onder | 1 |
| Yormaz, Seha | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lang, Joseph B. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023
This article is concerned with the statistical detection of copying on multiple-choice exams. As an alternative to existing permutation- and model-based copy-detection approaches, a simple randomization p-value (RP) test is proposed. The RP test, which is based on an intuitive match-score statistic, makes no assumptions about the distribution of…
Descriptors: Identification, Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Response Theory
Sunbul, Onder; Yormaz, Seha – International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 2018
In this study Type I Error and the power rates of omega (?) and GBT (generalized binomial test) indices were investigated for several nominal alpha levels and for 40 and 80-item test lengths with 10,000-examinee sample size under several test level restrictions. As a result, Type I error rates of both indices were found to be below the acceptable…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Cheating, Duplication, Test Length
Alessio, Helaine M.; Malay, Nancy; Maurer, Karsten; Bailer, A. John; Rubin, Beth – International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2018
Traditional and online university courses share expectations for quality content and rigor. Student and faculty concerns about compromised academic integrity and actual instances of academic dishonesty in assessments, especially with online testing, are increasingly troublesome. Recent research suggests that in the absence of proctoring, the time…
Descriptors: Supervision, Majors (Students), Computer Assisted Testing, Scores

Peer reviewed
Direct link
