Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 3 |
Item Analysis | 3 |
Correlation | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Academic Ability | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
High Achievement | 1 |
Individual Differences | 1 |
Latent Trait Theory | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Measurement:… | 3 |
Author
Arikan, Serkan | 1 |
Aybek, Eren Can | 1 |
Drasgow, Fritz | 1 |
Johnson, Matthew S. | 1 |
Linn, Robert L. | 1 |
Sinharay, Sandip | 1 |
Steinhauer, Eric W. | 1 |
Sweeney, Sandra M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sweeney, Sandra M.; Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S.; Steinhauer, Eric W. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
The focus of this paper is on the empirical relationship between item difficulty and item discrimination. Two studies--an empirical investigation and a simulation study--were conducted to examine the association between item difficulty and item discrimination under classical test theory and item response theory (IRT), and the effects of the…
Descriptors: Correlation, Item Response Theory, Item Analysis, Difficulty Level
Arikan, Serkan; Aybek, Eren Can – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
Many scholars compared various item discrimination indices in real or simulated data. Item discrimination indices, such as item-total correlation, item-rest correlation, and IRT item discrimination parameter, provide information about individual differences among all participants. However, there are tests that aim to select a very limited number…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Item Analysis, Correlation, Individual Differences

Linn, Robert L.; Drasgow, Fritz – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article discusses the application of the Golden Rule procedure to items of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Using item response theory, the analyses indicate that the Golden Rule procedures are ineffective in detecting biased items and may undermine the reliability and validity of tests. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory