Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 3 |
| Test Items | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Educational Testing | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
| Test Results | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
| Weiten, Wayne | 3 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWeiten, Wayne – Journal of Experimental Education, 1982
A comparison of double as opposed to single multiple-choice questions yielded significant differences in regard to item difficulty, item discrimination, and internal reliability, but not concurrent validity. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Educational Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Weiten, Wayne – 1979
Two different formats for multiple-choice test items were compared in an experimental test given in a college class in introductory psychology. In one format, a question or incomplete statement was followed by four answers or completions, only one of which was correct. In the other format, the double multiple-choice version, the same questions…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedWeiten, Wayne – Journal of Experimental Education, 1984
The effects of violating four item construction principles were examined to assess the validity of the principles and the importance of students' test wiseness. While flawed items were significantly less difficult than sound items, differences in item discrimination, test reliability, and concurrent validity were not observed. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests


