Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 4 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 4 |
Test Format | 4 |
Test Items | 4 |
Graduate Students | 3 |
Item Analysis | 3 |
Statistics | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Discriminant Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Tollefson, Nona | 4 |
Tripp, Alice | 2 |
Chen, Ju Shan | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Tollefson, Nona – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
This study compared the item difficulty, item discrimination, and test reliability of three forms of multiple-choice items: (1) one correct answer; (2) "none of the above" as a foil; and (3) "none of the above" as the correct answer. Twelve items in the three formats were administered in a college statistics examination. (BS)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests
Tollefson, Nona; Chen, Ju Shan – 1986
This study compared item difficulty and item discrimination indices for parallel multiple-choice items in three content areas: measurement concepts, statistical terminology, and synonyms. The statistics and measurement items were administered in classes where graduate students taking the test were studying the content. Vocabulary items represented…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Graduate Students, Higher Education, Item Analysis
Tollefson, Nona; Tripp, Alice – 1986
The item difficulty and item discrimination of three multiple-choice item formats were compared in experimental and non-experimental settings. In the experimental study, 104 graduate students were randomly assigned to complete one of three forms of a multiple-choice test: (1) a complex alternative ("none of the above") as the correct answer; (2) a…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Difficulty Level, Discriminant Analysis, Graduate Students
Tollefson, Nona; Tripp, Alice – 1983
This study compared the item difficulty and item discrimination of three multiple choice item formats. The multiple choice formats studied were: a complex alternative (none of the above) as the correct answer; a complex alternative as a foil, and the one-correct answer format. One hundred four graduate students were randomly assigned to complete…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Difficulty Level, Graduate Students, Higher Education